Search Results for "Transferable Development Rights"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Ac...
High Court of Karnataka Allows EPF Organisation's Writ Petition for Priority Pay...

Search Results for "Transferable Development Rights"

103 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 103 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Retrospective Amendment to Foreign Trade Policy and Customs Notification. Court Holds That Importers Have No Vested Right in Export Obligation Period and Retrospective Amendment Is Valid to Prevent Misuse of Duty Exemption Scheme.

30 Jan 2015

The Bombay High Court dismissed two writ petitions challenging the validity of Notification No.2(RE 2013)/2009-14 dated 18th April 2013, which retrosp...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows TDR Claim for Amenity Development Under Appendix 'W' of Thane Municipal Corporation Development Regulations. Petitioner entitled to Transferable Development Rights for developing amenity space on surrendered plot under Clause 6 of Appendix 'W'.

6 Aug 2019

The petitioner, M/s. Cosmos Realtors Joint Venture, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Seeking TDR for Parking Lot Construction Under Development Control Regulations. Petitioner entitled to Transferable Development Rights for constructing a separate parking lot building on municipal land as per DCR 33(9) read with DCR 34.

4 Apr 2019

The petitioner, Krishna Gopal Palande, filed a writ petition seeking a direction against the Mira Bhayandar Municipal Corporation to grant Transferabl...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows TDR Claim for Surrendered DP Road Land Despite No-Objection Condition. Transferable Development Rights cannot be denied merely because surrender was a condition of permission; entitlement arises from statutory scheme under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

4 Apr 2019

The petitioner, Nirmal Ujwal Credit Cooperative Society, challenged a communication dated 22.09.2014 from the Nagpur Municipal Corporation (Planning A...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal for Development Rights Certificate in Land Reservation Case. Held That Landowner Entitled to DRC for Entire Reserved Area Under Section 126(1)(c) of MRTP Act, 1966.

8 May 2023

The appellants, Godrej and Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited and its constituted attorney, owned land bearing CTS No. 2B (part) and 3B in Mumbai, wh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking TDR for Land Acquired Under MRTP Act — Transferable Development Rights Claim Barred by Limitation as Application Filed Beyond Reasonable Period After Possession. The court held that a claim for TDR under Section 126(1)(b) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 must be made within a reasonable period, and a delay of seven years from the date of possession disentitles the claimant.

10 Sep 2012

The petitioner, M/s. Karan Developers, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Pune Municipal Corporati...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses BBMP Appeal Against Single Judge Order Directing Regularisation of Unauthorised Construction Under Section 321 of KMC Act. Contempt Petition Closed as Compliance Achieved During Pendency of Appeal.

15 Oct 2025

The case involves a writ appeal filed by the Bruhath Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) against an order dated 29.05.2024 passed by a learned Single J...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Municipal Corporation's Mandamus for Land Acquisition Due to Lapsed Reservation and Financial Incapacity. Reservation under Development Plan Lapsed Under Section 127 of MRTP Act, 1966, and Acquisition Not Mandated as Corporation Lacked Funds Under RFCTLARR Act, 2013.

14 Feb 2022

The dispute involved a land reservation under the Kolhapur development plan sanctioned in 1999 for public purposes like parking and garden. The landow...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Landowners' Petition for Mandamus in Town Planning Acquisition Case — State Directed to Issue Declaration Under Section 126(2) MRTP Act for Playground Reservation. Failure to Complete Acquisition Despite Deposit of Compensation Entities Landowner to Writ of Mandamus Under Section 126(4) of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

6 Aug 2018

The petitioners, owners of land bearing Revision Survey No.138 admeasuring 3 Hectares and 65 Ares in Kolhapur, sought a writ of mandamus directing the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Secured Creditor IDBI in Company Petition for Oppression and Mismanagement — Upholds CLB Order Refusing Interim Relief. Court holds that a secured creditor cannot maintain a petition under Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956 for alleged mismanagement, as the remedy lies under the SARFAESI Act or other recovery laws.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves an appeal by Industrial Development Bank of India Ltd. (IDBI), a secured creditor, against an order of the Company Law Board (CLB) r...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)