Search Results for "Toll Collection"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Ac...
High Court of Karnataka Allows EPF Organisation's Writ Petition for Priority Pay...

Search Results for "Toll Collection"

40 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 40 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Judgment Directing Shift of Toll Plaza for Violation of National Highways Fee Rules. Construction at 194 km of NH30 Found to Violate Rule 8 of National Highways Fee (Determination of Rates and Collection) Rules, 2008 Due to Lack of Written Reasons and Failure to Meet Conditions for Municipal Area Placement.

23 Sep 2021

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by respondents 1 to 17 (writ petitioners) seeking to restrain the construction of a toll plaza at 194 km ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Tender Cancellation in Public Works Contract. Court Holds That No Vested Right Arises Until Formal Acceptance of Bid, and Government Has Discretion to Cancel Tender in Public Interest.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, Jai Laxmi Constructions and others, filed two writ petitions challenging the cancellation of a tender process and the issuance of a f...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court held that the arbitral tribunal's interpretation of contractual clauses was plausible and not patently illegal.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd., entered into a contract with the respondent, Jai Laxmi Constructions Engineers An...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute Between State of Maharashtra and Developer. Court Holds That Existence of Arbitration Clause and Failure of Respondent to Appoint Arbitrator Justifies Appointment Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

30 Nov -0001

The State of Maharashtra filed a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an arbitrator to reso...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows State's Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Land Acquisition Dispute — Compensation Enhancement Set Aside Due to Lack of Evidence. Court holds that the Arbitral Tribunal cannot award compensation beyond the Reference Court's award without proper evidence under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves two cross-petitions arising out of an arbitral award under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, concerning compensation for l...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Appeal Against Rejection of Section 9 Application for Appointment of Receiver in BOT Road Contract Dispute. The court held that the appellant contractor had a prima facie case and was entitled to appointment of a receiver to collect tolls pending arbitration under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

16 Nov 2013

The appellant, Ashoka Buildcon Ltd., a construction company, entered into a Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT) contract with the State of Maharashtra for im...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Toll Road Tender and Concession Period. Policy decisions regarding toll collection and concession periods are not subject to judicial review unless arbitrary or mala fide.

4 Sep 2013

The petitioner, Nandu Sambaji Nagarkar, a social worker, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Forfeiture of Earnest Money in Toll Collection Tender Dispute. Variation in Contract Period from 90 Weeks to 52 Weeks Constitutes Counter-Offer, Not Acceptance, Thus Forfeiture Invalid.

1 Apr 2014

The petitioner, M/s Abhay Construction, a partnership firm, submitted a tender to the Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd. for collecti...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows NHAI to Continue Toll Collection at Runni Toll Plaza. High Court judgment overturned; collected toll fees to be utilized for highway project cost recovery

24 Jul 2024

The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) appealed against the High Court judgment that prohibited toll collection at Runni Toll Plaza on Muzaff...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Extension of Toll Collection Period in BOT Road Project. Court holds that concession period extension is a contractual matter and not subject to judicial review under Article 226 in absence of arbitrariness or public interest violation.

17 Oct 2006

The petitioners, claiming to be public-spirited citizens, filed a writ petition in public interest challenging the decision of the State of Maharashtr...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)