Search Results for "Time Bound Promotion Scheme"

480 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 480 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines Validity of Uttar Pradesh Reservation in Promotion Rules Under Articles 16(4A) and 16(4B) of Constitution. Conflicting High Court Decisions on Requirement of Quantifiable Data for Backwardness and Inadequacy of Representation Lead to Appeals.

The case originated from a batch of civil appeals preferred by the U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. and the State of Uttar Pradesh challenging conflicting ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Maharashtra Revenue Services (Recruitment) Rules, 2020 and Directs Finalization of Seniority Lists for Deputy Collectors — Seniority to be Determined by Date of Continuous Officiation, Not by Date of Regular Promotion.

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by Deputy Collectors and the State of Maharashtra concerning the determination of seniority o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeals in MACP Scheme Financial Upgradation Dispute. Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme Entitles Employees to Next Higher Grade Pay, Not Grade Pay of Next Promotional Post.

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals filed by the Union of India against orders of various High Courts and Central Administrative Tribunals...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Whether Service for Time Bound Promotion Should Be Reckoned from Initial Appointment or Regularisation Date. Government Resolution and Supreme Court Precedents on 'Regular Service' Interpreted in Context of TBPS and ACPS.

The case involved a batch of writ petitions filed by the State of Maharashtra under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging orde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Transfer Orders of Teachers in Jalna District. Transfer orders issued by the Chief Executive Officer of Zilla Parishad, Jalna, were upheld as valid and not violative of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961.

The petitioners, 24 teachers employed by the Zilla Parishad, Jalna, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Primary Teachers Against Transfer Orders — Violation of Maharashtra Zilla Parishad Primary Teachers Transfer Rules, 2024. Court Quashes Transfer Orders as Arbitrary and Contrary to Statutory Rules, Directs Reconsideration.

The petitioners, 21 primary teachers employed by the Zilla Parishad, Beed, filed a writ petition challenging their transfer orders issued by the respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Refers Questions on Eligibility of Judicial Officers for Direct Recruitment as District Judges to Constitution Bench — Interpretation of Article 233(2) of Constitution of India, 1950 Regarding Requirement of Continuous Practice as Advocate.

The Supreme Court, in a reference by a three-Judge Bench, examined substantial questions of law concerning the interpretation of Article 233(2) of the...