Search Results for "Territorial applicability"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Territorial applicability"

409 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 409 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in MSME Act Jurisdiction Dispute Involving Foreign Buyer. The Court held that the Micro and Small Medium Enterprises Facilitation Council lacks jurisdiction under Section 18 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 when the buyer is located outside India, and the MSME registration occurred after the contract execution.

24 Mar 2022

The dispute originated from a Consulting Agreement dated 24.08.2020 between an Indian registered partnership consultant, acting as a supplier, and a S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Territorial Jurisdiction Dispute Under Section 21 CPC — Lower Appellate Court Erred in Reversing Trial Court's Finding on Jurisdiction Without Considering Waiver. The Court Remanded the Matter for Fresh Consideration on Whether the Objection Was Waived and Whether There Was Failure of Justice.

23 Jul 2013

The appellant, Miss Mridula Nikhar, filed a suit for recovery and possession of movable assets based on an agreement with the respondent, Shah Nature ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Refusal of Leave Under Clause 12 Letters Patent — Holds That Regional Office of Defendant Company Confers Territorial Jurisdiction. The court clarified that the Explanation to Section 20 CPC does not override Clause 12 of the Letters Patent, and a defendant company carrying on business through a regional office in Mumbai can be sued there even if the cause of action arose elsewhere.

3 Aug 2015

The appellant, KPL International Limited, filed an appeal against the judgment and order dated 18 June 2015 of the learned Single Judge of the Bombay ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Transfer of Suit for Specific Performance on Ground of Territorial Jurisdiction. Agreement Executed at Aurangabad Confers Jurisdiction Under Section 20(c) CPC, Despite Property Being in Vaijapur.

20 Feb 2024

The petitioners, original plaintiffs, filed a suit for specific performance of contract of sale and perpetual injunction in the Court of Civil Judge S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition for Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction in Foreign Award Enforcement. Court holds that under the amended Section 2(1)(e) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, only the High Court having jurisdiction over the subject matter of the award can entertain interim measures, not any court where assets are located.

9 Oct 2017

The petitioner, Trammo DMCC, a company incorporated in the UAE, obtained a foreign arbitral award against the respondent, Nagarjuna Fertilizers and Ch...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Civil Revision Application in Arbitration Matter — Section 34 Application Maintainable Only Before Court Having Jurisdiction Over Arbitration. Territorial jurisdiction for setting aside an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is determined by the court which would have jurisdiction over the arbitral proceedings, not the place of business of the award-holder.

21 Nov 2013

The petitioner, M/s Bhandari Udyog Limited, a company based in Raichur, Karnataka, entered into a contract with the second respondent, Indira Sahakari...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Calcutta High Court's Order Appointing Arbitrator Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. Territorial Jurisdiction for Section 11 Application Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Depends on Court as Defined in Section 2(1)(e), Not Merely on Seat Designation in Arbitration Clause.

24 Mar 2022

The appeals arose from orders of the Calcutta High Court dated 13 August 2021 and 4 October 2021. The appellant and respondent had entered into a deve...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Order Rejecting Objection to Territorial Jurisdiction in Service Termination Suit. Plaintiff's Cause of Action Arose at Nagpur Where She Worked and Was Terminated, Conferring Jurisdiction on Nagpur Courts Under Section 20(c) CPC.

6 Apr 2026

The respondent/plaintiff, Mrs. Archana Dongre, was employed as a Relationship Manager with HDFC Bank Limited at its Nagpur branch. Her services were t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Receiver in Execution Under Section 51(d) CPC Despite Property Being Outside Territorial Jurisdiction. Section 39(4) CPC Does Not Bar Appointment of Receiver as It Is an Independent Mode of Execution.

24 Aug 2018

The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by the decree-holders, Vistra ITCL (India) Limited and IIRF Holdings III Limited, in an execution applicatio...

Tribunals

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Chenna Hears Appeal Against NCLT's Admission of CIRP Under Section 7 IBC — Challenge on Territorial Jurisdiction. Suspended Director Argues Application Should Have Been Filed in Bangalore Under Section 60(1) IBC as Corporate Debtor's Registered Office is in Bangalore and Exception Under Section 60(2) Not Applicable.

1 Jan 1970

The appeal arises from an order dated 09.10.2023 passed by the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT, Chennai) admitting a petition under Section 7 of the Inso...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)