Search Results for "Tariff Classification"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Ac...
High Court of Karnataka Allows EPF Organisation's Writ Petition for Priority Pay...

Search Results for "Tariff Classification"

97 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 97 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Electricity Tariff Dispute — Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited v. Renew Wind Energy (Rajkot) Pvt Ltd. Renewable Energy Certificate (REC) Scheme does not override State Commission's power to determine tariff for wind energy under Section 62 of the Electricity Act, 2003.

13 Apr 2023

The case involves appeals under Section 125 of the Electricity Act, 2003, by Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited and other distribution licensees against...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Penalty for Excess Load Consumption as Unauthorised Use of Electricity Under Section 126 of Electricity Act, 2003 — Assessment at Twice the Higher Tariff Applicable for the Category of Use, Not Consumer's Category. The court held that consumption in excess of connected load constitutes unauthorised use under Explanation (b)(iv) and assessment under Section 126(6) must be at twice the tariff for the category for which electricity was unauthorisedly used.

9 Dec 2022

The case involves a batch of appeals by the Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB) against a judgment of the Kerala High Court which held that for unau...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute. n-Hexane Held to be a Separate Chemical Compound, Not Petroleum Oil, Under Customs Tariff Heading 2901.10 and Central Excise Tariff Heading 2901.90.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Customs, Kandla, against the decision of CESTAT, Ahmedabad, which had dismissed the Revenue's appea...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds MERC Tariff Regulation Fixing Stringent Station Heat Rate for Dahanu TPS — No Discrimination Found. The Court held that the Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission's differentiated norms for thermal generating stations based on past performance and efficiency are valid under the Electricity Act, 2003 and National Tariff Policy, 2006.

21 Jan 2019

The appellant, Reliance Infrastructure Limited, challenged the validity of Regulation 44.2(d) of the MERC (Multi Year Tariff) Regulations 2011, which ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Tariff Differentiation for Self-Financing Educational Institutions Under Electricity Act, 2003. The Court held that classification of Self-Financing Educational Institutions separately from Government and Aided Institutions for tariff purposes is permissible under Section 62(3) of the Electricity Act, 2003, as it is based on the nature of supply and purpose.

20 Feb 2020

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the Kerala State Electricity Regulatory Commission against the Division Bench judgment of the Kerala Hi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Advocate's Writ Petition Against Electricity Company for Charging Commercial Tariff to Residential Flat Used as Office. Professional Use of Residential Premises by Advocate Does Not Convert Domestic Electricity Connection into Commercial Use Under Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission Tariff Regulations.

4 Aug 2011

The petitioner, Rajendra G. Shah, an advocate practicing in Pune, used a residential flat (Flat No. 10B, Anandmayee Apartments) as his office. Initial...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in MVAT Classification Dispute — Multi Function Printers Held Classifiable as Automatic Data Processing Machines Under Entry 84.71. The Court ruled that multi function printers with copying, printing, scanning, and faxing capabilities are classifiable as automatic data processing machines or units thereof under Entry 84.71 of the VAT Notification, not as laser jet printers or under residual entry.

20 Dec 2018

The appellant, Ricoh India Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, filed an appeal under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 200...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute Over All-in-One Desktop Computers. Goods Classified as Portable Under Tariff Item 8471 30 10 Based on Weight and Transportability, Affecting Duty Valuation Under Central Excise Act, 1944.

17 Jan 2023

The Supreme Court of India addressed an appeal concerning the classification of Automatic Data Processing Machines, specifically All-in-One Integrated...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Commissioner's Appeal in Sales Tax Classification Dispute — Entry C74 'Plastic Footwear' Construed as Requiring Predominant Plastic Content, Not Exclusively Plastic. The product 'Escort 111 SYN Black', though not wholly made of plastic, was held to be covered by Entry C74 of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002, as it was predominantly made of plastic and moulded.

24 Jun 2011

The Commissioner of Sales Tax appealed against the decision of the Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal which had held that the product 'Escort 111 SYN Blac...

Supreme Court

High Court Dismisses Manufacturer's Appeals in Central Excise Classification Dispute. Classification of Benzene and Toluene Based on Purity Under Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and Procedural Compliance Under Central Excise Rules, 1944 Were Upheld by Tribunal.

28 Apr 2025

The appeals arose from a common order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) concerning classification and duty demands on...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)