Search Results for "Tariff Adoption"

19 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 19 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Grant of Transmission Licence Without TBCB in HVDC Project. Section 63 of Electricity Act, 2003 is an alternative route; regulatory commission has discretion to adopt regulated tariff mechanism for transmission projects.

The case involves a challenge by Tata Power Company Limited Transmission (TPC-T) against the grant of a transmission licence by the Maharashtra Electr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Distribution Licensee Against Tariff Revision for Change in Law Under Electricity Act, 2003. Non-Allocation of Coal Linkage Despite Government Assurance Constitutes Change in Law Entitling Generating Company to Compensatory Tariff.

The case involves a dispute between Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited (JVVNL), an electricity distribution licensee in Rajasthan, and Adani Power Raj...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute. n-Hexane Held to be a Separate Chemical Compound, Not Petroleum Oil, Under Customs Tariff Heading 2901.10 and Central Excise Tariff Heading 2901.90.

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Customs, Kandla, against the decision of CESTAT, Ahmedabad, which had dismissed the Revenue's appea...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Rajasthan Discoms Against APTEL Order Granting Change in Law Compensation to Power Generator. Interpretation of PPA Articles 10.2.1 and 10.5.1(ii) regarding supplementary bill and carrying cost is covered by earlier decisions.

The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal filed by Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. and other Rajasthan Discoms against an order of the Appellate Tribunal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Carrying Cost in Change in Law Claims Under PPA — Restitutionary Principle Upheld. Article 13.2 of Power Purchase Agreement Entitles Generating Company to Carrying Cost from Date of Change in Law Till Approval.

The case involves appeals by Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. and Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. (Haryana Discoms) and Gujarat Urja Vika...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Rules in Favor of Importer in Crude Palm Oil Customs Duty Dispute. High Court Cites Supreme Court Precedent, Orders Refund of Additional Duties Paid Due to Reassessment Based on Newly Issued Tariff Notification

The petitioner imported 12,250 metric tons of Crude Palm Oil under four contracts with Just Oil & Grain Pte. Ltd., Singapore. After the goods arri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Affirms CESTAT's Ruling: Labelling Constitutes Manufacturing under Central Excise Law. The Supreme Court clarifies the interpretation of "manufacture" under Note 3 of Chapter 18 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, supporting the respondent's cenvat credit claim.

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether labelling goods amounts to "manufacture" under the Central Excise Tariff Act. The case revolved aroun...