Search Results for "Take Home Ration"

91 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 91 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Concurrent Findings in Tenancy Declaration Suit. Applicant fails to prove membership of deceased tenant's family or residence in suit premises under Section 7(15)(d) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by Pradeep Kumar Lalit Kumar Pandya challenging the concurrent judgments of the Small Causes Cour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Tender for Construction of Commercial Complex in Thane. Court holds that no public interest is involved as the petition is filed by business rivals to scuttle a tender process.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by the Association for Protection of Civil Rights (APCR) and three other indi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Issues Directions for Migrant Labourers in Suo Motu Writ Petition During COVID-19 Pandemic. The Court ordered transportation, food provision, and withdrawal of prosecutions under Section 51 of the Disaster Management Act, 2005, to address miseries caused by lockdown and pandemic fears.

The Supreme Court of India, in a suo motu writ petition, addressed the severe hardships faced by migrant labourers during the COVID-19 pandemic, which...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Tenders for Take Home Ration and Hot Cooked Meal Programs. Court finds no violation of Supreme Court directions as impugned tenders were not issued by State Government but by Municipal Corporation.

The petitioner, Mumbai V. Konkan Vibhagiya Mahila Aydyogik Utpadak Sahakari Sanstha Mahasangh Ltd., a federation of women self-help groups registered ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Husband's Appeal for Divorce on Grounds of Cruelty and Desertion, Upholds Family Court's Refusal to Grant Divorce. Filing of False Criminal Complaint by Wife Does Not Automatically Constitute Cruelty for Divorce Under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

The appellant husband, Dr. Santosh Shetty, filed a Family Court Appeal challenging the judgment and decree dated 25.11.2013 passed by the Family Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incomplete Circumstantial Evidence. Last Seen Theory and Recovery of Articles Insufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Shivaji Vasang Bagale, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sawantwadi, for the murder of Sudha Puralkar under Section 302 I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder in Love Affair Case — Circumstantial Evidence Sufficient to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. The court held that the last seen theory coupled with motive and recovery of weapon established the guilt of the accused under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Satish Ramchandra Bavbande, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune for the murder of Neeta, a 16-year-old girl, under Sec...