Search Results for "Suo Moto order"

647 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 647 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Takes Suo Moto Cognizance of COVID-19 Public Health Infrastructure in Maharashtra. Court Refers to Earlier Principal Seat Judgment Highlighting State's Obligation Under Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897 and Disaster Management Act, 2005.

On 26.06.2020, the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, registered Suo Moto Criminal Public Interest Litigation No.1 of 2020 to ad...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeals in Tenancy Suo Moto Revision Case — Limitation Not Applicable to Section 84C Powers. Concurrent findings of fact by revenue authorities cannot be interfered with under Article 227 unless perverse.

The case involves a set of intra-court appeals (Letters Patent Appeals) filed against a common judgment dated 21.11.2016 passed by a learned Single Ju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjourns Suo Moto PIL for State's Statement. Court grants time until 3rd September 2020 for the State to respond in a public interest litigation.

This is a suo moto Public Interest Litigation registered by the Registrar Judicial of the High Court of Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, against the State...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Ceiling Act Case Due to Time-Barred Suo Motu Enquiry. Additional Commissioner Cannot Initiate Second Suo Motu Enquiry Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 After First Remand Order Had Attained Finality.

The petitioner, Uttamrao Ghatge, was a landholder from Salapuri, Parbhani, who filed returns under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Ceiling Act Case Due to Inordinate Delay in Suo Moto Notice. Additional Commissioner's Power Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Must Be Exercised Within Reasonable Time, Not After 17 Years.

The petitioner, Shantabai Sundarrao Deshmukh, is the legal representative of Sundarrao Rangrao Deshmukh, who died on 31.01.1989. The husband of the pe...