Search Results for "Summary Procedure"

2442 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2442 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding Up Petition Against Hubtown Ltd. Based on Bona Fide Dispute of Debt. Corporate Guarantee Enforcement Requires Prima Facie Case of Default and Absence of Substantial Dispute Under Section 433(e) of Companies Act, 1956.

The petitioner, IDBI Trusteeship Services Ltd., filed a company petition under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956 seeking winding up of Hubtown...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding Up Petition by Association Against Member Company for Unpaid Guarantee Amounts. Association's claim for winding up under Sections 433 and 434 of Companies Act, 1956 fails as debt is disputed in good faith and substantial dispute exists.

The petitioner, Travel Agents Federation of India, an association of travel agents, filed a winding up petition under Sections 433 and 434 of the Comp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Show Cause Notices Under Section 344 CrPC for Filing False Affidavits in Anticipatory Bail Proceedings — Mere Filing of False Affidavits Not Sufficient to Initiate Summary Proceedings for Contempt

The petitioners, who were members of a Gram Panchayat, filed affidavits in support of an anticipatory bail application filed by an accused involved in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court on its Own Motion Proceeds Against Individual for Scandalous Facebook Posts Targeting Judges. Court Stresses That Such Vicious Attacks on Judiciary Constitute Gross Criminal Contempt Undermining Rule of Law.

Suo-motu criminal contempt proceedings were initiated by the Bombay High Court against an individual who, through his Facebook profile, published a se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Examines Conviction of Trap Witness Under Section 344 CrPC for Alleged False Evidence in Corruption Case. Court Analyzed Whether Contradictory Statements During Cross-Examination Constituted Wilful Perjury as Defined Under Section 191 IPC.

The appellant was a panch witness in a corruption case tried by the Special Judge, Akola. The original case involved allegations that a Junior Enginee...