Bombay High Court Quashes Show Cause Notices Under Section 344 CrPC for Filing False Affidavits in Anticipatory Bail Proceedings — Mere Filing of False Affidavits Not Sufficient to Initiate Summary Proceedings for Contempt

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 48
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, who were members of a Gram Panchayat, filed affidavits in support of an anticipatory bail application filed by an accused involved in offences under Sections 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. The learned Additional Sessions Judge, while rejecting the bail application, observed that the affidavits submitted by the petitioners were false and that they had tried to mislead the court. Consequently, show cause notices dated 19/4/2016 were issued to the petitioners under Section 344 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC). The petitioners appeared before the court on 28/4/2016, but further proceedings were stayed by the High Court on 4/5/2016. The petitioners challenged the notices, contending that the mere filing of false affidavits does not warrant action under Section 344 CrPC, relying on the judgment in Dr. (Miss) Azmy Pest Bharucha vs. The State of Maharashtra (2000 ALL MR (Cri) 459). The High Court agreed, holding that Section 344 CrPC requires a specific finding that the false statement was made intentionally and that it is expedient in the interests of justice to try the offender summarily. Since the impugned notices were issued merely on the basis of some documents filed in the proceedings without such findings, they were quashed and set aside. The petition was allowed.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Contempt of Court - Section 344 CrPC - Summary Procedure for False Evidence - The court held that merely observing that false affidavits were filed in any proceeding is not sufficient to issue show cause notices under Section 344 CrPC; there must be a specific finding that the false statement was made intentionally and that it is expedient in the interests of justice to try the offender summarily. The impugned notices were quashed as they were issued without such findings. (Paras 3-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the issuance of show cause notices under Section 344 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, based solely on the observation that false affidavits were filed in bail proceedings, is legally sustainable

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The impugned notices dated 19/4/2016 issued under Section 344 of the Code of Criminal Procedure are quashed and set aside.

Law Points

  • Section 344 CrPC requires a specific finding that the false statement was made intentionally and that it is expedient in the interests of justice to try the offender summarily
  • mere filing of false affidavits without such finding is insufficient
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (08) 165

Criminal Writ Petition No.348 of 2016

2017-08-10

P.N. Deshmukh

Shri P.W. Mirza for petitioners, Shri S. Sirpurkar for respondent

Smt. Anita Anil Kale, Raviprakash Raut/Ravindra Raut, Anjuman Khan Muzzaffar Khan, Ghulamnabi Mohd. Habib

State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal writ petition challenging show cause notices issued under Section 344 CrPC for filing false affidavits in bail proceedings

Remedy Sought

Quashing of show cause notices dated 19/4/2016 issued under Section 344 CrPC

Filing Reason

Petitioners were issued show cause notices under Section 344 CrPC on the ground that they filed false affidavits in support of an anticipatory bail application

Previous Decisions

The learned Additional Sessions Judge rejected the bail application and observed that the affidavits were false; thereafter notices under Section 344 CrPC were issued

Issues

Whether the issuance of show cause notices under Section 344 CrPC based solely on the observation that false affidavits were filed is legally sustainable

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that mere filing of false affidavits is not sufficient to issue notices under Section 344 CrPC, relying on Dr. (Miss) Azmy Pest Bharucha vs. The State of Maharashtra Respondent argued in support of the notices

Ratio Decidendi

Section 344 CrPC requires a specific finding that the false statement was made intentionally and that it is expedient in the interests of justice to try the offender summarily; mere filing of false affidavits without such findings is insufficient to initiate summary proceedings.

Judgment Excerpts

recourse adopted by learned Additional Sessions Judge to Section 344 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is contrary to law as merely observing that false affidavits are filed in any proceeding is not sufficient to issue show cause notices under the said provision the impugned notices are issued merely on the basis of some documents filed in the proceedings and as such, the same cannot be sustained

Procedural History

The petitioners filed affidavits in support of an anticipatory bail application in Miscellaneous Criminal Application No.1095/2015 before the Additional Sessions Judge, Amravati. The judge rejected the bail application and observed that the affidavits were false. On 19/4/2016, show cause notices under Section 344 CrPC were issued to the petitioners. The petitioners appeared on 28/4/2016, but proceedings were stayed by the High Court on 4/5/2016. The petitioners then filed the present writ petition challenging the notices.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 344
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 468, 471
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Show Cause Notices Under Section 344 CrPC for Filing False Affidavits in Anticipatory Bail Proceedings — Mere Filing of False Affidavits Not Sufficient to Initiate Summary Proceedings for Contempt
Related Judgement
Supreme Court "Appellant's Major Penalty Quashed: Failure to Record Oral Evidence in Disciplinary Proceedings Invalidates Inquiry" "Natural Justice and Procedural Mandates Triumph Over Procedural Deficiencies in Disciplinary Proceedings."