Search Results for "Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966"

20 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 20 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Sugar Cane Reservation Dispute — Upholds Single Judge's Order Quashing Government Notification. Court holds that notification under Section 21 of the Karnataka Sugar Cane (Regulation of Supply and Purchase) Act, 1961 must be based on actual production capacity and not on installed capacity.

21 Nov 2025

The case involves a dispute over the reservation of cane supply area under the Karnataka Sugar Cane (Regulation of Supply and Purchase) Act, 1961. The...

Supreme Court

"Supreme Court Clarifies Legislative Competence on Alcohol Regulation: Potable vs Industrial Alcohol" "A landmark judgment addressing the scope of State and Union powers on regulating alcohol under the Indian Constitution."

23 Oct 2024

The Supreme Court of India revisited the legislative competence concerning the regulation of alcohol under the Constitution. The court examined whethe...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Denial of NOC for Sugar Mill — No Legal Right to NOC Under Sugarcane Control Order. The court held that the Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966 does not confer a right to obtain a No Objection Certificate for setting up a sugar mill, and the Commissioner's refusal based on existing capacity was valid.

31 Mar 2023

The appellants, M/s Askins Biofuels Private Limited and M/s Shri Bharmanandasagar Jaggery Industries, filed a writ appeal against the order of a learn...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Non-Speaking Order in Sugar Industry Licensing Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice and Binding Precedent. Order of Commissioner for Cane Development set aside for being contrary to earlier court direction and lacking reasons.

6 Jan 2023

The petitioners, M/S. Askins Biofuels Private Limited and M/S. Shri. Bhramanandasagar Jaggery Industries, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Non-Speaking Order in Sugar Industry Licensing Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice and Previous Court Direction. Order passed without considering objections and contrary to earlier writ court direction to hear petitioners before granting licence to third party.

6 Jan 2023

The petitioners, M/s. Askins Biofuels Private Limited and M/s. Shri Bhramanandasagar Jaggery Industries, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds State's Power to Fix Higher Sugarcane Price in Conflict Resolution Between Constitution Benches. State Advised Price (SAP) is Valid and Not Repugnant to Central Minimum Price Under Essential Commodities Act, 1955 and Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966.

22 Apr 2020

The Supreme Court considered a reference from a three-judge bench regarding an alleged conflict between two Constitution Bench decisions: Ch. Tika Ram...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeals in Income Tax Case on Disallowance of Excess Cane Price Paid by Cooperative Society. Excess Payment Over Statutory Price Under Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966 Held Not Deductible as Business Expenditure Under Section 37(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

5 Mar 2019

The case involves a batch of appeals by the Commissioner of Income Tax, Bombay against the assessee, Tasgaon Taluka Sahakari Sikhar Karkhana Limited, ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Sugar Mills' Appeals Against Sugarcane Price Fixation Orders — State Government's Power to Fix Minimum Price Under Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966 Upheld. The court held that price fixation is a quasi-legislative function and no hearing is required before fixing the minimum price of sugarcane.

12 Feb 2015

The case involves four writ appeals filed by sugar mills (M/s. Sri Chamundeshwari Sugars Ltd., M/s. Shamanur Sugars Limited, The India Sugars & Refine...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Sugar Mills' Appeals Against Sugarcane Price Fixation Order — State's Power to Fix Minimum Price Upheld. The Court held that the Sugarcane Control Board's order fixing the minimum price of sugarcane at Rs. 2,500 per tonne was valid and not arbitrary, as it was based on recommendations of the Cane Commissioner and aimed at protecting farmers' interests.

12 Feb 2015

The case involves appeals by four sugar mills against an order of the Sugarcane Control Board fixing the minimum price of sugarcane at Rs. 2,500 per t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Aerial Distance Certificate for New Sugar Factory — Notification Increasing Distance Not Retrospective. The court held that the Commissioner of Sugar was not required to consider factors beyond aerial distance under Clause 6-B of the Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966.

5 Dec 2014

The petitioner, a sugar factory registered under the Companies Act, 1956, challenged the order dated 2 July 2011 of the Commissioner of Sugar, Maharas...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)