Search Results for "Stirring oil"

6 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Rule 14 and Section 13(2) of PFA Act. Benefit of Doubt Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Prove Proper Stirring of Oil Sample and Timely Intimation of Right to Get Sample Analyzed.

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal under Section 378(4) of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 against the judgment dated 27-11-2002 in Regular Cr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case — Failure to Prove Sample Collection from Accused's Shop. Prosecution Could Not Establish That Linseed Oil Sample Was Taken from Respondent's Possession as Panchanama Did Not Mention Sample Collection.

The State of Maharashtra, through the Food Inspector, filed an appeal against the acquittal of Deepak Shankarrao Shirbhate, proprietor of M/s. Mahakal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision of Accused in Food Adulteration Case — Groundnut Oil Sample Found Adulterated. Accused Failed to Prove Due Diligence Under Section 19(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954.

The case arises from a criminal revision application filed by Kantilal Parasmal Jain, the original accused, challenging his conviction under Section 7...