Search Results for "State Government revision"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "State Government revision"

3692 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3692 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Landlord in Eviction Suit After Permission Reinstatement Under U.P. Rent Control Act. Commissioner's Revocation of Permission Under Section 3(3) Reversed by State Government Under Section 7F, Rendering Pending Suit Maintainable.

30 Oct 1968

The dispute pertained to the maintainability of an eviction suit filed by the respondent-landlord against the appellant-tenant in respect of a house i...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Revisional Order Under Urban Land Ceiling Act After Repeal Proposal. State Government retains jurisdiction under Section 34 of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 until formal repeal takes effect.

6 May 2010

The petitioners, nine individuals and one through their power of attorney holder, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging the decis...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Letters Patent Appeal Against Single Judge’s Order Upholding State Minister’s Decision in Evacuee Property Mutation Dispute. Minister's Order Had Set Aside Lower Authorities' Orders Restoring Evacuee Property Entries.

13 Jul 2005

This Letters Patent Appeal arose from a dispute over evacuee properties in Lonavala. The original owner, Haji Habib Tar Mohammed Janu, migrated to Pak...

High Court

Bombay High Court Clarifies Revisionary Powers Under Section 154 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act — Concurrent Jurisdiction and Single Exercise of Power. The court held that Section 154(1) does not confer concurrent jurisdiction on the Registrar and State Government, and the revisional power can be exercised only once.

21 Apr 2011

The Bombay High Court, in a common judgment, addressed two sets of questions of law referred by a learned single Judge concerning Section 154 of the M...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Minister's Revision Order in Land Partition Dispute — Holds That Revenue Authorities Cannot Reopen Final Civil Court Decrees Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. The court ruled that the revisional power under Section 257 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 cannot be used to re-adjudicate a partition decree that attained finality in 1956, and that a delay of over 12 years in filing revision is fatal.

4 Nov 2025

The Bombay High Court was hearing a batch of writ petitions challenging an order dated 27 September 2024 passed by the Minister (Revenue and Forest De...

High Court

Bombay High Court Clarifies Maintainability of Revision Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 — Interlocutory Procedural Orders Not Revisable. Division Bench Holds That Revision Under Section 34(4) is Limited to Orders Affecting Rights or Liabilities of Parties and Does Not Extend to Purely Procedural Orders Passed Under CPC.

21 Jan 2013

The Bombay High Court was seized of three writ petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging orders passed by the Court of Small Causes ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition Challenging Maintainability of Civil Revision Against Director's Order Under Section 66(7) of Goa Panchayat Raj Act. Order of Director of Panchayats under Section 66(7) is final and binding, and no Civil Revision lies under Section 201-B of the Act.

23 Dec 2015

The petitioner, Competent Automobiles Company Ltd., applied for a licence to construct a Beach Resort at village Arossim, Goa, based on a technical cl...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner's Challenge Against Minister's Revision Order in Fair Price Shop Licence Cancellation Case. Revisional Authority Cannot Enlarge Scope of Revision; District Supply Officer's Cancellation Order Restored.

31 Jan 2013

The petitioner, Balbhim Sukhdeo Limbkar, filed a complaint against respondent No.4, Manisha Nagesh Shinde, who was running a fair price shop. The Tahs...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Minister's Order Restoring Fair Price Shop License Without Hearing Complainant — Revision Under Clause 24(1) of Maharashtra Scheduled Commodities Order, 1975 Requires Notice to Affected Parties. The court held that the revision order was passed in gross violation of natural justice and was not maintainable due to inordinate delay of eight years.

4 Jul 2019

The petitioner, Gautam Kathalu Hiwale, an APL card holder, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging an order ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Condonation of Delay in Filing Revision under Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994, Holding Section 5 of Limitation Act Applies. The Court ruled that a revision under Section 201-B is a 'petition' covered by Section 239-B, which expressly incorporates Sections 4, 5, 12, and 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963, and no provision excludes condonation of delay.

7 Aug 2017

The dispute arose from a demolition order issued by the Village Panchayat of Queula against the petitioner for alleged illegal construction, based on ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)