Search Results for "Slum Act 1971"

171 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 171 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Writ Petition Challenges AGRC Orders Quashing Acceptance of Slum Rehabilitation Proposal by Landowner. Petitioner Contends AGRC Exceeded Jurisdiction and Misconstrued Circular 144A Requirements.

The petitioner, a charitable trust and owner of the subject property, filed a writ petition under Article 227 challenging two orders of the Apex Griev...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Legal Dispute Over Termination of Developer's Appointment for SRS Implementation in Mumbai. Unraveling the Complexities of Land Allocation and Timely Implementation in Slum Rehabilitation Schemes in Maharashtra

Legal dispute regarding the termination of a developer's appointment for implementing a Slum Rehabilitation Scheme (SRS) in Mumbai under the Maharasht...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Developer Appointment in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme. Petitioner's failure to obtain 70% slum dweller consent and submit documents within stipulated time justified termination under Section 13(2) of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Surjit Singh Arora, sole proprietor of M/s. Sukhamani Construction, was appointed as developer for a slum rehabilitation scheme under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Slum Land Acquisition Notification for Non-Compliance with Section 14(1) of Maharashtra Slum Act. Land Owner's Property Acquired Without Proper Application by SRA and Without Opportunity of Hearing.

The petitioner, Deena Pramod Baldota, is the owner of land bearing CTS No.355 (part) and other sub-numbers admeasuring about 5115.2 sq. meters situate...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Slum Rehabilitation Authority's Grant of Scheme to Another Developer. Court upholds SRA's decision based on eligibility criteria and policy, finding no arbitrariness or violation of principles of natural justice.

The Petitioners, Dyna Estate Pvt. Ltd. (a developer) and Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Nagar Sahakari Griha Nirman Sanstha (a proposed cooperative society of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Sections 14 and 17 of Maharashtra Slum Act in Land Acquisition Challenge. Challenge to Acquisition Under Section 14 and Award Under Section 17 Rejected as Provisions Held Intra Vires Constitution.

The petitioners, Nenshi Monji (Bombay), a Family Trust and Others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the acquisi...