Search Results for "Shipping Bill conversion"

21 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 21 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Customs Case — Conversion of DEEC Shipping Bill to Drawback Scheme Denied. CBEC Circular No. 4/2004 Mandates Prior Denial of DEEC Benefit by DGFT or Customs Authorities, Which Was Not Established.

The appellant, Manawat Plastics Pvt. Ltd., exported Woven PP Bags/Fabrics under three Shipping Bills dated 06.08.2002, 13.08.2002, and 16.09.2002 unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Customs Case — Conversion of Shipping Bill from DEEC to Drawback Scheme Denied. CBEC Circular No. 4/2004 requires prior denial of DEEC benefit by DGFT or Customs; mere inability to utilize advance license does not qualify.

The appellant, Manawat Plastics Pvt. Ltd., exported Woven PP Bags/Fabrics under three Shipping Bills dated 06.08.2002, 13.08.2002, and 16.09.2002 unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Department's Appeal in Customs DFIA Scheme Conversion Case. Circular No.36/2010 Held Directory, Not Mandatory, Allowing Amendment of Shipping Bills Beyond Time Limit.

The case involves appeals filed by the Commissioner of Customs (Export) against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Short Delivery in Multimodal Transport Due to Limitation Under Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, 1925. The court held that the suit filed beyond one year from delivery was time-barred and plaintiff failed to prove short delivery.

The plaintiff, M/s. Assobhai Bhanji and Sons, a registered partnership firm engaged in import and export of dairy and agro products, filed a suit agai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit Against Carrier for Short Delivery of Goods Due to Lack of Privity of Contract and Limitation. Bill of Lading Holder Cannot Sue Carrier When Goods Were Delivered to Consignee Without Endorsement of Original Bill of Lading.

The plaintiff, M/s. J. Harkishandas & Co., a partnership firm, filed a suit against the first defendant, Lloyd Triestino, a foreign shipping company, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Customs Duty Demand on Vessels Imported Prior to Notification. Condition No.82 of Notification 12/2012-Cus. Cannot Be Applied Retrospectively to Vessels Imported Before Its Effective Date.

The petitioner, The Great Eastern Shipping Company Ltd., imported two vessels, 'Jag Rishi' and 'Jag Rahul', prior to 17.03.2012. On 17.03.2012, the Ce...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Claim for Short Delivery of Urea Due to Lack of Title to Sue Under Bill of Lading. Plaintiff Not a Party to Bill of Lading and Cannot Maintain Admiralty Action for Short Landing.

The plaintiff, Dreymoor Fertilizers Overseas Pte. Ltd., filed an admiralty suit against the vessel m.v. Theoforos-1 claiming short delivery of 520.30 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Customs Valuation Case — Confirms CESTAT's Finding That Transaction Value of Imported Goods Is Acceptable Under Section 14 of Customs Act, 1962. Burden of Proof on Revenue to Show Fraud or Misdeclaration Not Discharged.

The case involves four Civil Miscellaneous Appeals filed by the Commissioner of Customs (Port-Export), Chennai, under Section 130 of the Customs Act, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals Against Arrest of Vessel in Cargo Damage Claim — Maritime Lien Not Established. Bill of Lading Claim Does Not Give Rise to Maritime Lien; Owner Not Liable Due to Demise Clause.

The case involves three appeals filed against an order of a learned single Judge of the Bombay High Court in Admiralty Suit No.27 of 1999. The suit wa...