Search Results for "Section 95A MHAD Act"

8 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 8 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging MBRRB Notices and Order in Bhendi Bazar Redevelopment Project. Court upholds validity of notices under Section 95A of MHAD Act and order appointing SBUT as developer, finding no violation of natural justice or statutory provisions.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by occupants of Sardharia Building in Bhendi Bazar, Mumbai, challenging actions of the Bombay Building ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Summary Eviction Order Against 80-Year-Old Tenant in MHADA Redevelopment Dispute. Petitioner's Right to Alternate Accommodation Under Section 95A of MHADA Act Upheld as Board Failed to Provide Permanent Rehabilitation Before Eviction.

The petitioner, Sugrabai Gulam Abas Tambawala, an 80-year-old housewife, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challeng...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MHADA Order in Redevelopment Dispute — Upholds Developer's Right to Fair Hearing. Section 95A of MHADA Act, 1976 Requires Compliance with Natural Justice Before Revoking Development Rights.

The petitioners, M/s Darshan Jayant Builders (a partnership firm) and its partner Pritesh M. Jain, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Cons...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging MCGM's Condition of 100% Tenant Consent for Redevelopment of Dilapidated Buildings. Clause 1.15 of C-1 Guidelines Requiring Permanent Alternate Accommodation Agreements with All Tenants as Precondition for Commencement Certificate is Valid and Enforceable.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the condition imposed by the Municipal Corpo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes NOC Cancellation Order in MHADA Housing Dispute — Procedural Violation of Natural Justice. Board's Order Cancelling No Objection Certificate Set Aside as Passed Without Hearing Affected Parties, Violating Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioners, Bharat Kanakia and Rajendra Shah, along with others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 16...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Letter of Intent for Cluster Redevelopment Under DCR 33(9) — No Violation of Tenant Rights Found. Petitioner's claim of illegalities in documents and failure to execute permanent alternate accommodation agreements rejected as premature and lacking merit.

The petitioner, Mr Murtuza Shabbir Tinwala, a resident and tenant in the Bhendi Bazaar Area, filed a Writ Petition challenging the Letter of Intent (L...