Search Results for "Section 69(3)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Section 69(3)"

119 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 119 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Refers to Larger Bench the Question Whether Mere Membership of a Banned Organization is Punishable Under Section 10 of UAPA, 1967 — Earlier Decisions in Arup Bhuyan and Raneef Holding That Mere Membership Does Not Incriminate Without Violence or Incitement Are Reconsidered as Union of India Was Not Heard.

24 Mar 2023

This judgment arises from a reference to a larger Bench of the Supreme Court of India, questioning the correctness of the decisions in Arup Bhuyan v. ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Reference in Corruption Case: Demand Must Be Proved by Direct or Circumstantial Evidence, Not Mere Recovery. Proof of demand is sine qua non for offences under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, and presumption under Section 20 arises only after demand is established.

15 Dec 2022

This reference to a Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court arose from a conflict between three-judge bench decisions regarding the proof of demand of...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Revenue Authorities in Stamp Duty Undervaluation Cases — Revisional Powers Under Section 47A of Indian Stamp Act, 1899 Upheld. The Court held that the limitation period for suo motu revision by the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority is five years from the date of the order, not from the date of registration.

1 Jan 2020

The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of civil appeals arising from orders of the Madras High Court concerning the interpretation of Section 47A of...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Enforcement of Foreign Award Against NAFED in Groundnut Export Dispute — Government Refusal Does Not Excuse Breach Under FOSFA Contract. The court held that a canalizing agency cannot rely on its own lack of permission as a force majeure event under Clause 14 of the FOSFA 20 Contract, and enforcement of the award is not against public policy despite procedural irregularities.

22 Apr 2020

The case involves a dispute between National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India (NAFED), a canalizing agency for the Government of...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in NI Act Case: Director Can Be Prosecuted Without Company Being Arraigned as Accused if Complaint Contains Requisite Averments Under Section 141. The Court held that the absence of the company as an accused is not fatal and lack of specific averments can be cured, restoring the summoning order against the director.

9 Dec 2022

The Supreme Court considered appeals against the High Court of Allahabad's judgment quashing criminal proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Penalty on Part-Time Director in FERA Contravention Case Due to Lack of Specific Findings on Responsibility. Liability Under Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 Requires Proof That Director Was in Charge of and Responsible for Conduct of Business at Relevant Time, Not Mere Directorship.

27 Jul 2020

The appeal arose from a penalty imposed on the appellant, a part-time non-executive director of Modi Xerox Ltd., for alleged contravention of the Fore...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Short Delivery of Petroleum Products Case: Legal Metrology Act, 2009 Does Not Bar IPC Offences for Cheating and Criminal Conspiracy. The Court held that the High Court erred in quashing proceedings as the special Act does not exclude IPC offences for cheating and criminal conspiracy, and the investigation was valid.

23 Aug 2019

The Supreme Court allowed appeals by the State of Uttar Pradesh against the High Court's order quashing proceedings in a case involving short delivery...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal, Restores Arbitral Award in Contractor vs. Irrigation Corporation Dispute. Court Holds That Section 34 Court Exceeded Its Jurisdiction by Reappreciating Evidence and Setting Aside Award on Grounds Not Permitted Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

15 Apr 2026

The present Commercial Arbitration Appeal was filed by M/s. Shinde & Sons, a contractor, under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 199...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Amalgamated Company Must File Return for Pre-Amalgamation Period. Section 153A Notice Validly Issued to Transferor Company Despite Amalgamation, and Failure to File Return Attracts Penalty Under Section 276CC.

1 Jan 2022

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) against the order of the Delhi High Court, which had ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Allows Revenue's Appeal in MVAT Penalty Case — Section 61(2) Does Not Permit Reduction of Penalty Below Statutory Rate. The court held that once a penalty is imposed under Section 61(2) of the MVAT Act, the quantum must be exactly one tenth per cent of total sales, with no discretion to reduce.

15 Sep 2011

The Revenue appealed against a decision of the Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal reducing a penalty imposed under Section 61(2) of the Maharashtra Value ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)