Search Results for "Section 67 statement"

2 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in NDPS Case Due to Inadmissible Confession and Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Sections 22(c) and 29 of NDPS Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove supply or conspiracy beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Ajay Kumar Gupta, was accused no.2 in a case under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act). The prosecution...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Nigerian National in NDPS Case for Heroin Possession and Conspiracy. Court finds that NCB followed mandatory procedures and that the appellant's statement under Section 67 of NDPS Act was voluntary and admissible.

The appellant, a Nigerian national, was convicted by the Special Judge for NDPS, Greater Mumbai, for offences under Sections 8(c) read with 21(B) and ...