Search Results for "Section 32P"

24 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 24 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Petition, Sets Aside Tahsildar's Order for Possession Without Reasons Under Section 32P(g) of B.T. and A.L. Act. The court held that the Tahsildar must give reasons and conduct an enquiry before taking possession from the tenant.

The petitioners, tenants of agricultural land, challenged the order of the Tahsildar dated 19-9-1986, which took possession of the land from them and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Revenue Tribunal Order in Land Tenancy Dispute. Concurrent findings of fact that petitioners failed to prove tenancy rights under Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 upheld.

The petitioners, Pradip Vasudeo Ekbote and others, filed four writ petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging a common order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Petition Challenging Land Transfer Without Previous Sanction Under Section 43 of Bombay Tenancy Act. Post-transfer sanction cannot regularize invalid transfer; MRT order set aside.

The petitioner, Smt. Saraswati Shamrao Dhere, was a tenant of half portion of agricultural land in Shiroli, Kolhapur. Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 were ten...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits — Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits Dismissed as Barred by Limitation and Res Judicata

The petitioners (original plaintiffs) filed a suit for possession and mesne profits against the respondents (original defendants) in respect of agricu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Land Dispute — No Interference Under Article 227 as Findings of Fact Are Not Perverse. The court held that concurrent findings of fact based on evidence cannot be interfered with under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.

The case involves a writ petition filed by the petitioners (heirs of the original plaintiff) challenging the concurrent findings of the lower courts i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Petition in Tenancy Dispute Over Delayed Payment of Purchase Price. Belated payment with interest and penalty before landlord's application does not render sale ineffective under Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

The petitioners, Baburao Pandurang Madane and Vithal Pandurang Madane, were tenants of agricultural land survey No. 39/1 at village Kusmod, Taluka Mal...