Search Results for "Section 32(1) Evidence Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Section 32(1) Evidence Act"

349 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 349 result(s)

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Government Order Directing Withdrawal of Criminal Cases Under Section 321 CrPC — Violation of Public Prosecutor's Independent Discretion. The court held that the State Government cannot compel Public Prosecutors to withdraw cases; the power under Section 321 CrPC must be exercised independently by the prosecutor.

29 May 2025

The petitioner, an advocate enrolled with the Karnataka State Bar Council, filed a public interest petition challenging Government Order No.HD 129 MHB...

Supreme Court

"Supreme Court of India Resolves Complexities in Taxation of Mineral Rights" "Judgment Clarifies Legislative Powers and the Nature of Royalty in Mining Sector"

25 Jul 2024

The Supreme Court of India addressed a significant dispute regarding the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States, specific...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape of Minor Under POCSO Act — Victim's Testimony Found Credible Despite Minor Inconsistencies. The court held that the sole testimony of a minor victim, if credible, is sufficient to sustain a conviction for aggravated penetrative sexual assault under Section 376(2)(i) IPC read with Sections 4, 6, 8 of POCSO Act.

3 Mar 2021

The appellant, Jitendra Rajmohan Mazi, was convicted by the Special Judge, Sindhudurg at Oros in Special Case No.44 of 2015 for offences under Section...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Release of Accused Under Section 169 CrPC in NDPS Case — Special Prosecutor Acted Without Investigating Officer's Consent. The court held that the investigating officer's consent is mandatory for an application under Section 169 CrPC, and the Special Prosecutor cannot independently decide to release accused when there is evidence of possession of psychotropic substances like Tramadol without license.

4 Mar 2019

The Union of India, through the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI), filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 29 October 2018 passed by ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Accused in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC — Proceedings Initiated Without Valid Sanction for Public Servants Are Void Ab Initio.

12 Jun 2015

The State of Karnataka, through the Sub-Inspector of Police, Nyamathi Police Station, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking to quas...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Disposes of Death Reference and Appeals Arising from 2000 Church Bomb Blast Case. Accused Allegedly part of Deendar Anjuman, charged with conspiracy under IPC Sections 120-B, 121-A, 124-A, 153-A.

17 Dec 2014

On December 17, 2014, the High Court of Karnataka delivered a common judgment in Criminal RC No. 3/2008, Criminal Appeal No. 1203/2008, and Criminal A...

High Court

KAHC010422252008_1

17 Dec 2014

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Death Sentence Confirmation and Appeals against Conviction in 2000 Church Bomb Blast. Accused were convicted under Sections 120-B, 121-A, 124-A, 153-A IPC by Trial Court for conspiracy and bomb blast at St. Peter and Paul Church, Bangalore.

17 Dec 2014

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard together a criminal reference for confirmation of death sentence and two criminal appeals arising from ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Revision Against Rejection of Withdrawal from Prosecution in Sessions Trial for Offences Under IPC and Bombay Police Act. Trial Court's Order Upheld as Public Interest and Complainant's Right to be Heard Were Properly Considered Under Section 321 CrPC.

30 Nov 2006

The State of Maharashtra filed a criminal revision application under Section 397 read with Section 399 CrPC challenging the order of the 2nd Ad-hoc Ad...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Appeal Against Conviction Under Section 5 TADA for Possession of Weapon. Appellant Challenges Recovery Evidence and Disclosure Statement in Bombay Blast Case.

1 Jan 1970

...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)