Search Results for "Section 31-A"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Section 31-A"

173 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 173 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioners in Land Consolidation Dispute, Holding That Modification Application Under Section 31A of Maharashtra Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947 Must Be Filed Within Reasonable Time and Only Before Settlement Commissioner. Deputy Director of Land Records Lacks Authority to Modify Scheme After 40 Years.

2 Feb 2018

The petitioners, ten individuals, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Deputy Director of Land Records, Nasik Division, which allowed an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging 47-Year-Delayed Gut Map Amendment Under Maharashtra Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947. Power Under Section 31A Must Be Exercised Within Reasonable Time Despite Absence of Limitation; Amendment Creating New Road Held Not a Mere Clerical Correction.

6 Jul 2026

The Bombay High Court heard a writ petition challenging an order dated 14 August 2008 by the Superintendent of Land Records, Sangli, amending a Gut Ma...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Arguments on Constitutional Validity of Shivraj Fine Art Litho Works (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertaking) Act, 1984 — Matter Remains Undecided in Provided Text. Petitioner Contended Act Lacked Nexus with Directive Principles and Was Not Protected Under Article 31C.

26 Feb 2014

The petitioners, M/s Shivraj Fine Art Litho Works, a partnership firm, challenged the constitutional validity of the Shivraj Fine Art Litho Works (Acq...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Land Records Authority's Order Amending Consolidation Scheme After 47 Years for Being Unreasonable. Exercise of Power Under Section 31A of Maharashtra Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947 Must Be Within Reasonable Time.

6 Jul 2026

The Writ Petition was filed by agriculturists of Village Shene challenging the order dated 14.08.2008 passed by the Superintendent of Land Records, Sa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Guarantor's Petition in RDB Act Execution Case — Notice Under Section 31A Mandatory. Failure to Serve Notice on Judgment Debtors Before Issuing Recovery Certificate Violates Natural Justice and Section 31A of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993.

14 Jun 2017

The petitioner, Dr. Sudhakar Borkar, was a guarantor to a loan taken by respondent No.5 (M/s R & S Enterprises) from respondent No.1 (State Bank of In...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Validity of Revenue Department’s Order Rejecting Correction of Clerical Error in Land Consolidation Scheme Under Section 31A of the Maharashtra Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947. The Court Scrutinizes Whether the Mandatory Procedure for Scheme Implementation Under Section 22 Was Complied With and Whether Limitation Under Section 32 Bars Correction of Clerical Mistakes.

21 Nov 2025

The matter pertains to a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the ord...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Orders Under Section 32(3) of Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947 — Deputy Director Lacked Jurisdiction to Reopen Final Consolidation Scheme After 30 Years. The court held that once a certificate under Section 22 is issued, the scheme attains finality and cannot be reopened under Section 32(3) except for clerical errors.

13 Feb 2020

The petitioners, Padmabai Narayan Chaudhary and others, filed a writ petition challenging two orders passed by the Deputy Director of Land Records, Au...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Vires of Explanation to Rule 3 of Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis (Manner and Rotation of Reservation of Seats) Rules, 1996 — Explanation Held Valid. The Explanation does not travel beyond Section 12 of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961 and is constitutionally valid.

8 Jan 2014

The petitioner, Mrs. Shailaja Sunil Kolpe, filed a writ petition challenging the vires of the Explanation to Rule 3 of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Late Filing Fee Under Section 234E of Income Tax Act. Petitioners Seek Declaration that Section 234E is Unconstitutional and Violative of Articles 14, 265, and 277.

12 Jun 2015

This batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the cons...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Constitutional Challenge to COFEPOSA Preventive Detention Powers for Foreign Exchange Violations. Petitioners Contend Absence of Penal Provisions Under FEMA Renders Section 3(1) Unconstitutional.

1 Aug 2026

The writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution was filed directly in the Supreme Court challenging the constitutional validity of Section 3(1)...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)