Search Results for "Section 28-A Land Acquisition Act"

65 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 65 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Petitioners' Writ Petition in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Non-Compliance with Lok Adalat Settlement Alleged. Court Examines Whether Mandamus Should Issue to Enforce Settlement and Dispose Pending Section 28-A Applications Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The dispute concerned land acquisition for the New Bombay Project. Petitioners, agriculturists from village Roadpali, Taluka Panvel, District Raigad, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Redetermination of Compensation Under Section 28A of Land Acquisition Act — Collector Directed to Consider Application and Pass Award Within Three Months. Petitioner's Right to Seek Higher Compensation Based on Subsequent Award in Reference Case Upheld.

The petitioner, Sk. Allauddin, owned agricultural land bearing Gat No. 25 at Ellora, which was acquired by a notification dated 12.03.1991 under Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Disposal of Section 28A Applications Despite Pending Appeals in Land Acquisition Case. Landowners' Applications for Redetermination of Compensation Cannot Be Kept Pending Solely Due to Pendency of State's Appeals Against Reference Court Award.

The petitioners were owners of lands acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. An award under Section 11 was made in 1988. In 1999, they filed ap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Directs Expeditious Disposal of Applications Under Section 28A of Land Acquisition Act Pending Before Authorities. Applications for Re-determination of Compensation Based on Court Awards Not Yet Decided; Outer Time Limit of Six Months Set for Completion of Enquiry.

This batch of writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India sought a direction from the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Reconsideration of Section 28A Application Without Certified Copy in Land Acquisition Case. The court held that the requirement of certified copy is directory and the authority should have given an opportunity to produce it.

The petitioner, Tukaram Janaba Patil, aged 96, owned agricultural lands in Gut no.1274 and 1277 at Village Kalkundri, Taluka Chandgad, District Kolhap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Rejection of Section 28A Application as Time-Barred — Limitation Period of 90 Days for Seeking Redetermination of Compensation Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Is Mandatory and Cannot Be Extended.

The petitioner, Mrs. Zainabi, challenged the orders dated 14th May 2010 and 15th June 2012 passed by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, Bangalore D...