Search Results for "Section 271(2)"

17 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 17 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Software Export Tax Exemption Case. ITAT's finding that assessee's software development services qualify as 'computer software' under Section 10B of Income Tax Act, 1961 upheld.

The present appeal was filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Income Tax Department (appellants) against the order dated 19.01.2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition, Restores Eviction Decree in Sub-Lease Dispute for Breach of Covenant. Failure to pay municipal taxes and insurance premium constituted breach of condition under Section 111(g) of Transfer of Property Act, 1882, justifying forfeiture and eviction.

The petitioner, as lessor, had granted a sub-lease of land and buildings to the first respondent for 98 years. The sub-lease deed contained covenants ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Accused in Co-operative Society Misappropriation Case Due to Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC. Members of Managing Committee Held to be Public Servants Entitled to Protection for Acts Done in Discharge of Official Duty.

The petitioners, Balaji Rajaram Chatlawar and the deceased Maroti Keshavrao Jagtap, were members of the managing committee of Yeshwant Co-operative Ho...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Writ Petitions Against Labour Court Orders in Recovery Proceedings Under Section 33C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 — Held That Assignee Bank Steps Into Shoes of Transferor and Is Liable for Pre-Transfer Claims of Workmen.

The petitioners, the Authorized Officer and Chairman & Managing Director of IDBI Bank (Stressed Assets Stabilization Fund), filed four writ petitions ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Municipal Corporation in MRTP Act Notice Case — Notice Under Section 89 MRTP Act Held Valid and Not Barred by Limitation. The Court set aside the trial court decree declaring the notice invalid, finding that the notice was within limitation but the suit was premature.

The appellant, Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, filed a First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 against the oral ju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against High Court's Direction to Frame Additional Charges Under Sections 406 and 420 IPC. High Court Exceeded Revisional Jurisdiction by Evaluating Evidence at Charge-Framing Stage Under Section 216 CrPC.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh which allowed a revision petition filed by the fourth respondent (father-in-law o...