Search Results for "Section 269UD"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Section 269UD"

11 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 11 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit Challenging Income Tax Order for Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 269UN of Income Tax Act, 1961. Jurisdiction of Civil Court Barred as Appropriate Authority's Order Under Chapter XXC Is Final and Conclusive.

7 Apr 2014

The plaintiff, Sasmita Investments Ltd., filed a suit in the Bombay High Court challenging an order passed by the Appropriate Authority under Chapter ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Cooperative Housing Society's Petition Against Income Tax Department's Forcible Possession — Society Members Held to be Purchasers for Value Without Notice Under Section 269UE of Income Tax Act, 1961. The court quashed the order dated 21.10.1994 under Section 269UD and the communication dated 2.8.2017 threatening forcible possession, holding that the society members were bona fide purchasers for value without notice.

23 Jul 2019

The petitioner, New White Rose CHS Ltd, a Cooperative Housing Society, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 21.10.1994 passed by the Appro...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Compulsory Purchase of Property Under Chapter XXC of Income Tax Act — Delay in Passing Order Does Not Invalidate Acquisition. The period of two months under Section 269UD(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for passing an order for compulsory purchase is directory, not mandatory, and the order passed after 16 years was upheld.

30 Jul 2013

The petitioners, Satish Balan, Ratish Balan, Janki Balan, and Adarsh Sehtty, entered into an agreement for purchase of a property admeasuring 555 sq. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preemptive Purchase Orders Under Chapter XXC of Income Tax Act — Difference in Valuation Below 15% Threshold. The Appropriate Authority's orders under section 269UD(1) were set aside as the difference between fair market value and apparent consideration was less than 15%, and no opportunity of hearing was given.

23 Dec 2011

The petitioners, Pandharinath Bhikaji Telge and Dattaram Bhikaji Telge, were owners of a property in Chembur, Mumbai. They entered into an agreement t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Holds Auction Purchaser Not Liable to Pay Unearned Increase to DDA in Compulsory Acquisition Case. Conversion Charges Refunded as Property Conveyed Was Freehold, Not Leasehold.

12 Feb 2019

The Supreme Court of India heard two cross-appeals arising from a judgment of the Delhi High Court dated 30.03.2016 in LPA No.226 of 2014. The dispute...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Pre-emptive Purchase Order Under Income Tax Act for Undervalued Property. Appropriate Authority's Valuation Based on Comparable Sales Upheld as Reasonable.

29 Jul 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by prospective buyers (Krishna Kumar Rawat & Ors.) and partly allowed the appeal by the Union of India against a H...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Pre-emptive Purchase Order Under Section 269UD(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Comparable Sale Instance and Failure to Establish 15% Undervaluation. The Appropriate Authority's reliance on a non-comparable sale instance and incorrect computation of fair market value rendered the order unsustainable.

25 Nov 2005

The petitioners, owners of an open plot of land in Pune, challenged an order dated February 23, 1995, passed by the Appropriate Authority under Sectio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Compulsory Acquisition Order Under Income Tax Act for Non-Application of Mind. Appropriate Authority Failed to Consider Comparable Sales in Same Building, Rendering Order Under Section 269UD(1) Invalid.

9 Oct 2006

The petitioners, owners of a flat in Mumbai, entered into an agreement to sell the flat for Rs. 19 lakhs and filed Form 37-I under Chapter XX-C of the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Cooperative Law Revision Case — No Second Revision Under Section 154 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. Revisional Authority Exceeded Jurisdiction by Entertaining Second Revision Against Order of Divisional Joint Registrar.

1 Dec 2005

The present petition raised an issue whether under the provisions of Section 154 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, a power can be ex...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Cancellation of Auction for Income Tax Acquired Property — Auction Process Found Bona Fide and in Public Interest. The Court held that the cancellation of the appellant's bid was not arbitrary as it was in public interest to fetch the highest price, and the subsequent auction process was valid.

20 Sep 2019

The appeal arose from a property admeasuring 1053.5 square meters in Mumbai, acquired by the Union of India in 1994 under Section 269UD(1) of the Inco...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)