Search Results for "Section 255(3)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "Section 255(3)"

29 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 29 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Review Petition in Service Matter — No Error Apparent on Record. Second review petition not maintainable as it seeks re-agitation of issues already decided, and no grounds under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC exist.

15 Jul 2022

The petitioner, Anand Prabhakar Joshi, a former employee of the Bank of Maharashtra, filed a second review petition before the Bombay High Court seeki...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Imposed on Mining Operations — Petitions Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India Seek to Declare Notification Ultra Vires and Quash Demand Notices. The petitioners contended that Section 98A of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and the Notification dated 16.08.2008 were unconstitutional and not applicable to mining leases on non-forest lands.

3 Dec 2015

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions filed by various mining companies, individuals, and an industry association challenging th...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Constitutional Validity of Forest Development Tax Notification and Demands. Petitioners Challenge vires of Karnataka Forest Act section 98A and Notification under Forest Conservation Act.

3 Dec 2015

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Examines Validity of Notification Imposing Forest Development Tax under Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 — Multiple Mining Companies Challenge the Levy as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws.

3 Dec 2015

The matter involved a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by various mining companies, individuals, and an industry assoc...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification Under Karnataka Forest Act. Petitioners Contended That the Levy on Mineral-Bearing Land Violated Article 246, Entry 54 of Union List, and Forest Conservation Act, 1980.

3 Dec 2015

The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by several minin...

High Court

KAHC010479002008_1

3 Dec 2015

The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a consolidated batch of writ petitions filed by various entities including National Mineral Development ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification on Mining Leases; Examines Legislative Competence under Karnataka Forest Act and Forest (Conservation) Act.

3 Dec 2015

A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka challenging the validity of Notification No. FEE/23/2007-08 dated 16.08.2008 is...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Writ Petitions Concerning Forest Development Tax on Mining Leases Under Karnataka Forest Act, 1963; Constitutional Validity of Section 98A and Notification Examined. The petitioners contended that the notification dated 16.08.2008 and demand of forest development tax from holders of mining leases in forest areas were repugnant to the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 and ultra vires the State's legislative competence.

3 Dec 2015

A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by various entities inc...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal for Enhancement of Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Deceased was a Software Engineer Aged 39 Years. Tribunal's multiplier of 13 and failure to add future prospects were corrected, resulting in enhanced compensation of Rs.1,18,99,000/-.

4 Nov 2015

The appeal was filed by the claimants, being the wife, minor daughter, and parents of the deceased Annappa Mallappa Hipparagi, against the judgment an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Employer Not Liable for Wages During Lockout Period Due to Binding Settlement. Settlement Between Union and Employer Under Section 28 of MRTU & PULP Act Precludes Claim for Wages for Period of No Work.

15 Jun 2010

The appellant, M/s. Mehta Gem Tools Private Limited, challenged an order of the learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court in Writ Petition No. 255...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)