High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal for Enhancement of Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Deceased was a Software Engineer Aged 39 Years. Tribunal's multiplier of 13 and failure to add future prospects were corrected, resulting in enhanced compensation of Rs.1,18,99,000/-.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal was filed by the claimants, being the wife, minor daughter, and parents of the deceased Annappa Mallappa Hipparagi, against the judgment and award dated 06/11/2013 passed by the III Additional Senior Civil Judge and Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bengaluru (SCCH-18) in MVC No.2553/2012. The Tribunal had awarded compensation of Rs.87,37,145/- with interest at 8% per annum for the death of the deceased in a road traffic accident. The deceased was aged 39 years and was working as a Software Engineer earning Rs.75,000/- per month. The claimants sought enhancement of compensation. The High Court, after hearing the counsel for the appellants and the respondent-Insurance Company, held that the Tribunal had erred in applying a multiplier of 13 instead of 15 as per the principles laid down in Sarla Verma v. Delhi Transport Corporation, (2009) 6 SCC 121, and in not adding 50% towards future prospects as per the decision in Rajesh v. Rajbir Singh, (2013) 9 SCC 54. The Court recalculated the loss of dependency by taking the monthly income as Rs.75,000/-, adding 50% towards future prospects, deducting 1/4th towards personal expenses, and applying multiplier 15, resulting in a total loss of dependency of Rs.1,18,99,000/-. The Court also awarded Rs.1,00,000/- towards loss of consortium, Rs.1,00,000/- towards loss of love and affection, Rs.25,000/- towards funeral expenses, and Rs.10,000/- towards loss of estate. The total compensation was enhanced to Rs.1,18,99,000/- with interest at 8% per annum from the date of petition till realization. The appeal was allowed in part.

Headnote

A) Motor Accident Claims - Compensation - Enhancement - Deceased aged 39 years, Software Engineer - Claimants sought enhancement of compensation awarded by Tribunal - Held that Tribunal erred in applying multiplier of 13 instead of 15 as per Sarla Verma case, and in not adding 50% towards future prospects - Compensation enhanced from Rs.87,37,145/- to Rs.1,18,99,000/- with interest at 8% per annum (Paras 1-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the claimants are entitled to enhancement of compensation awarded by the Tribunal for the death of the deceased in a road traffic accident.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed in part. Compensation enhanced from Rs.87,37,145/- to Rs.1,18,99,000/- with interest at 8% per annum from the date of petition till realization.

Law Points

  • Motor Vehicles Act
  • 1988
  • Section 173(1)
  • Compensation for death
  • Multiplier method
  • Future prospects
  • Deduction for personal expenses
  • Interest rate
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (KAR) (11) 36

M.F.A. No.1332 of 2014(MV)

2015-11-04

N.K. Patil, Pradeep D. Waingankar

Shri. R. Vijaya Kumar (for appellants), Shri. B. Pradeep (for respondent 2)

Mrs. Rajeshwari G. Bhuyar, Baby Apeksha .A, Mr. Mallappa Annappa Hipparagi, Smt. Kasturi

Sindhu Travels, M/S ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against judgment and award of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal seeking enhancement of compensation for death in road traffic accident.

Remedy Sought

Enhancement of compensation awarded by the Tribunal.

Filing Reason

Claimants were dissatisfied with the compensation awarded by the Tribunal for the death of the deceased.

Previous Decisions

The Tribunal awarded compensation of Rs.87,37,145/- with interest at 8% per annum.

Issues

Whether the multiplier applied by the Tribunal (13) is correct? Whether the Tribunal erred in not adding future prospects to the income of the deceased?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that the Tribunal applied wrong multiplier of 13 instead of 15 and did not add future prospects. Respondent-Insurance Company supported the Tribunal's award.

Ratio Decidendi

In motor accident claims, for a deceased aged 39 years, the appropriate multiplier is 15 as per Sarla Verma, and 50% should be added towards future prospects as per Rajesh v. Rajbir Singh.

Judgment Excerpts

The Tribunal by its judgment and award has awarded compensation of `87,37,145/- under different heads with interest at 8% per annum... The Tribunal has committed an error in taking the multiplier as 13 instead of 15... The Tribunal has not added any amount towards future prospects... In the light of the decision of the Apex Court in Rajesh v. Rajbir Singh, 50% of the income is to be added towards future prospects...

Procedural History

The claimants filed MVC No.2553/2012 before the III Additional Senior Civil Judge and Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bengaluru, which awarded compensation on 06/11/2013. Aggrieved, the claimants filed MFA No.1332/2014 before the High Court of Karnataka.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: Section 173(1)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Reopening of Assessment Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2004-05. Mere Change of Opinion Cannot Justify Reopening When All Material Facts Were Disclosed During Original Asse...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Amalgamation of Transferor Companies with Transferee Company under Sections 391-394 of Companies Act, 1956 — No Objection from Authorities and Compliance with Statutory Requirements. The court held that the sch...