Search Results for "Section 222"

584 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 584 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Title Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed. Registered Deed Not Mandatory for Relinquishment of Right; Revenue Entries Have Evidentiary Value.

The appellant, Hansaben w/o Jivan Bariya, filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the concurrent fin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Appeal of Legal Heir in Trust Property Dispute. Claim of Ownership and Adverse Possession Fails as Land Registered as Trust Property Under Gujarat Public Charitable Trust Act, 1950.

The appellant, Niteshbhai Bhanjibhai Khetiya, filed a first appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 read with Section 72(4) of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Workman Status in Industrial Dispute. Tribunal's finding that employee was a 'workman' under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 upheld as not perverse.

The petitioner, M/s. Procter and Gamble Health Limited (formerly Merck Ltd.), challenged an award dated 28.02.2020 passed by the Industrial Tribunal a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Upholds Acquittal in Murder Case Based on Benefit of Doubt and Lack of Credible Evidence. Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt in Dowry Death Allegation Under Sections 498A, 302, 201 IPC.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order of the learned Sessions Judge, Beed in Sessions Case No. 90 of 2000, whereby both the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell Not Proved, but Alternative Relief of Damages Granted. Court holds that failure to prove agreement does not bar claim for earnest money refund under Section 22 of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The appellant, an architect, filed three suits for specific performance of agreements to sell immovable property against Gustavo Pinto and Lucio Miran...