Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Attempt to Rape Minor and Causing Hurt — Evidence of Victim and Rescuer Found Credible, Medical Evidence Corroborates Sexual Assault. Conviction under Section 376 read with Section 511 IPC and Section 324 IPC sustained as prosecution proved case beyond reasonable doubt.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Prosecution
  • 105
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Vijay Kisan Kumbhare, was convicted by the 6th Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Amravati in Sessions Trial No. 145 of 1999 for offences under Section 376 read with Section 511 IPC (attempt to rape) and Section 324 IPC (causing hurt by dangerous means). He was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for five years and a fine of Rs.5000 for the attempt to rape, and six months rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs.1000 for causing hurt. The victim, a minor girl aged about 7 years, was playing in front of her house on 15th August 1999 (Nagpanchami festival) when the accused, in an inebriated condition, allured her with a packet of biscuits and took her behind the Primary Health Center at Bhatkuli. He removed her knicker, caused bite injuries on her cheek, waist and buttock, and committed sexual intercourse. On hearing her cries, Kishor Chouhan (PW-4) rushed to the spot, removed the accused, and slapped him. He noticed injuries on the victim. The victim and accused were taken to the victim's house, and the victim narrated the incident to her mother Pushpabai (PW-2), who lodged an oral report (Exh.42) at the police outpost. The police registered Crime No. 93 of 1999, arrested the accused, and referred the victim for medical examination. The medical report (Exh.57) showed injuries consistent with sexual assault. The trial court convicted the accused, leading to the present appeal. The High Court examined the evidence of the victim (PW-1), her mother (PW-2), the rescuer (PW-4), and the investigating officer (PW-5). The court found that the victim's testimony was credible and corroborated by medical evidence and the rescuer's testimony. Minor inconsistencies in the victim's statement did not discredit her evidence. The court held that the prosecution had proved the offences beyond reasonable doubt. The appeal was dismissed, and the conviction and sentence were upheld.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Attempt to Rape - Section 376 read with Section 511 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Conviction upheld - Victim, a minor girl aged 7 years, was allured with biscuits and taken to a secluded place where accused removed her knicker, caused bite injuries on cheek, waist and buttock, and committed sexual intercourse - Rescuer witnessed the act and removed accused - Medical evidence showed injuries consistent with sexual assault - Held that the evidence of victim and rescuer is credible and corroborated by medical evidence, minor inconsistencies do not affect the prosecution case (Paras 2-10).

B) Criminal Law - Causing Hurt - Section 324 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Conviction upheld - Accused caused bite injuries on the victim's cheek, waist and buttock using his teeth, which are dangerous means - Medical evidence confirmed injuries - Held that the act of biting constitutes causing hurt by dangerous means under Section 324 IPC (Paras 2-10).

C) Evidence Law - Testimony of Child Witness - Credibility - Minor inconsistencies in the testimony of a child witness do not discredit her evidence if the core of the prosecution case remains consistent and corroborated - Held that the victim's testimony was reliable and corroborated by medical evidence and the rescuer's testimony (Paras 7-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the appellant for offences under Section 376 read with Section 511 IPC and Section 324 IPC is sustainable based on the evidence on record

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is dismissed. The conviction and sentence recorded by the trial court for offences under Section 376 read with Section 511 IPC and Section 324 IPC are upheld.

Law Points

  • Conviction under Section 376 read with Section 511 IPC requires proof of attempt to commit rape with intention and preparation
  • minor inconsistencies in victim's testimony do not discredit her evidence
  • medical evidence of injuries corroborates sexual assault
  • Section 324 IPC for causing hurt with dangerous weapon or means
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (BOM) (11) 129

Criminal Appeal No. 277 of 2007

2019-11-07

Mrs. Swapna Joshi

Mr. N. A. Badar for Appellant, Mr. Amit Chutke, APP for Respondent

Vijay Kisan Kumbhare

State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for attempt to rape and causing hurt

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal from conviction under Sections 376 read with 511 and 324 IPC

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted by trial court and sentenced to imprisonment and fine

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted appellant for offences under Section 376 read with 511 IPC and Section 324 IPC, acquitted under Section 376(2)(f) IPC

Issues

Whether the conviction under Section 376 read with Section 511 IPC is sustainable Whether the conviction under Section 324 IPC is sustainable

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the evidence of the victim and other witnesses is inconsistent and unreliable Respondent argued that the prosecution proved the case beyond reasonable doubt through credible witnesses and medical evidence

Ratio Decidendi

The evidence of the minor victim, corroborated by medical evidence and the testimony of the rescuer, is sufficient to prove the offences of attempt to rape and causing hurt beyond reasonable doubt. Minor inconsistencies in the victim's testimony do not discredit her evidence.

Judgment Excerpts

The victim (PW-1) is a minor girl aged about 7 years. Accused came there in inebriated condition, took the victim (PW-1) to the shop of one Hakim, purchased the packet of Biscuit and handed over it to the victim (PW-1). He removed her knicker and caused biting injuries on her cheek, waist and buttock. On hearing cries of the victim (PW-1), one Kishor Chouhan (PW-4) rushed to that place, removed the Accused from the person of victim and slapped him.

Procedural History

The trial court (6th Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Amravati) convicted the appellant on 30th March 2007 in Sessions Trial No. 145 of 1999. The appellant filed Criminal Appeal No. 277 of 2007 before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, which was dismissed on 7th November 2019.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 376, 511, 324, 376(2)(f)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Hears Section 9 Arbitration Petitions in Redevelopment Dispute Between Co-operative Housing Society and Developer. Interim Relief Sought for Declaration of Termination and Stay of Termination Notice.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay Dismisses Employer's Writ Petitions Against Gratuity Orders Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. The Court upheld the Controlling and Appellate Authorities' decisions, finding no error in adjudicating delayed applications or in c...