Search Results for "Section 2(44)"

546 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 546 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Review Petition Filed by Customs Department in Customs Act Case — DRI Officers Held as Proper Officers. The Court overruled earlier decisions and upheld Section 28(11) of the Customs Act, 1962 as constitutionally valid, restoring the Department's power to issue show cause notices.

The Supreme Court, in a batch of petitions led by Review Petition No. 400 of 2021, considered the correctness of its earlier judgment in M/s Canon Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator in Arbitration Petition Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Disputes arose from Construction Management Agreements regarding completion notices and fee obligations, with the court determining arbitration under those agreements was appropriate.

The Supreme Court of India dealt with two arbitration petitions filed by DLF Home Developers Limited (DHDL) under Section 11(6) read with Section 11(1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Order Allowing Complainant to Lead Further Evidence After Accused's Evidence in Private Complaint. Section 246 Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Re-examination of Complainant After Accused's Evidence.

The case involves a criminal petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. by the petitioner (accused No.1) against the respondent (complainant). The respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application in Suit for Permanent Injunction — Dispute Over Property Rights and Possession. Court Holds That Trial Court Erred in Dismissing Application Under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC Without Proper Application of Mind and Without Considering Prima Facie Case.

The revision application was filed by the applicants (original plaintiffs) challenging the order dated 23.11.2017 passed by the trial court dismissing...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Denial of Interest on Refund Under Section 214 of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Held That Interest Is Mandatory and Must Be Paid on Entire Refund Amount from Date of Payment of Advance Tax.

The petitioner, M/s. Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 14.6.1988 passed by the Commissioner of Income Ta...