Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Interest on Refund Under Section 244A of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Petitioner Entitled to Interest from Date of Payment of Tax to Date of Refund. The court held that interest on refund is payable under Section 244A from the date of payment of tax to the date of refund when the refund arises due to an appellate order reducing the tax liability.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 55
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, M/s. J. K. Industries, a registered partnership firm engaged in ship breaking, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 1984-85 on 30 June 1984, declaring a loss of Rs. 1,79,830. The Assessing Officer completed the assessment under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on 23 March 1987, determining total income at Rs. 4,83,658 and making an addition of Rs. 6,63,500 under Section 68 in respect of capital contributed by partners. A demand notice of Rs. 4,31,815 was issued. The petitioner paid the tax under protest. The petitioner appealed to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), who dismissed the appeal on 22 February 1989. The petitioner then appealed to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) on 11 May 1989. The ITAT, by order dated 30 August 1991, allowed the appeal and deleted the addition under Section 68, resulting in a refund of Rs. 4,31,815. The refund was granted on 11 September 1991. The petitioner applied under Section 264 of the Act to the Commissioner of Income Tax for interest on the refund. The Commissioner rejected the application on 30 April 2004, holding that the refund was not due to the assessment order but to the appellate order, and therefore no interest was payable. The petitioner challenged this order by way of a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. The court considered the provisions of Section 244A of the Act, which provides for interest on refunds. The court held that the petitioner is entitled to interest under Section 244A from the date of payment of tax to the date of refund. The court observed that the refund arose because the ITAT deleted the addition, and the tax paid pursuant to the demand notice became refundable. The court set aside the Commissioner's order and directed the respondents to pay interest on the refund amount from the date of payment of tax (23 March 1987) to the date of refund (11 September 1991) at the rate prescribed under Section 244A within eight weeks.

Headnote

A) Income Tax - Interest on Refund - Section 244A, Income Tax Act, 1961 - Entitlement to Interest - The petitioner, a partnership firm, paid tax pursuant to an assessment order that was later reduced on appeal. The refund was granted but interest was denied by the Commissioner under Section 264. The High Court held that the petitioner is entitled to interest under Section 244A from the date of payment of tax to the date of refund, as the refund arose due to the appellate order reducing the tax liability. (Paras 1-18)

B) Income Tax - Revision under Section 264 - Scope of Power - Section 264, Income Tax Act, 1961 - The Commissioner's power under Section 264 is revisional and includes the power to grant interest on refunds. The Commissioner erred in rejecting the application for interest on the ground that the refund was not due to the assessment order but to the appellate order. The court clarified that interest is payable on refunds arising from any order, including appellate orders, under Section 244A. (Paras 10-18)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to interest on the refund of tax paid under a demand notice, and from which date such interest should be calculated.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court allowed the writ petition, set aside the order dated 30 April 2004 passed by Respondent No.1 under Section 264, and directed the respondents to pay interest on the refund amount of Rs. 4,31,815 from the date of payment of tax (23 March 1987) to the date of refund (11 September 1991) at the rate prescribed under Section 244A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 within eight weeks.

Law Points

  • Interest on refund
  • Section 244A
  • Section 264
  • Income Tax Act
  • 1961
  • Entitlement to interest
  • Date of payment
  • Date of refund
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (06) 115

WRIT PETITION NO. 2942 OF 2004

2023-06-16

K. R. SHRIRAM, FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA

Mr. Madhur Agrawal i/b. Mr. Atul K. Jaswani, for Petitioner; Mr. Suresh Kumar, for Respondents

M/s. J. K. Industries

Krishna Sahal, Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai City-XXV; The Union of India

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging an order under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 rejecting the petitioner's application for interest on refund.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought interest on the refund of tax paid pursuant to a demand notice, from the date of payment to the date of refund.

Filing Reason

The Commissioner of Income Tax rejected the petitioner's application for interest on refund under Section 264, holding that the refund was not due to the assessment order but to the appellate order.

Previous Decisions

Assessment order dated 23 March 1987 under Section 143(3) determining income at Rs. 4,83,658 and adding Rs. 6,63,500 under Section 68; CIT(A) dismissed appeal on 22 February 1989; ITAT allowed appeal on 30 August 1991 deleting the addition and resulting in refund of Rs. 4,31,815; refund granted on 11 September 1991; Commissioner rejected interest application on 30 April 2004.

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to interest on the refund of tax paid under a demand notice under Section 244A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. From which date should interest on refund be calculated: from the date of payment of tax or from the date of the appellate order?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that it is entitled to interest under Section 244A from the date of payment of tax to the date of refund, as the refund arose due to the ITAT order deleting the addition. Respondent argued that the refund was not due to the assessment order but to the appellate order, and therefore no interest was payable under Section 244A.

Ratio Decidendi

Under Section 244A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, interest on refund is payable from the date of payment of tax to the date of refund when the refund arises due to an appellate order reducing the tax liability. The Commissioner's power under Section 264 includes the power to grant such interest.

Judgment Excerpts

Petitioner is seeking to challenge an order dated 30th April 2004 passed under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by Respondent No.1, rejecting application of Petitioner to grant interest on refund under the provisions of Sections 244/244A of the Act. The court held that the petitioner is entitled to interest under Section 244A from the date of payment of tax to the date of refund.

Procedural History

Assessment order dated 23 March 1987 under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961; appeal to CIT(A) dismissed on 22 February 1989; appeal to ITAT allowed on 30 August 1991; refund granted on 11 September 1991; application under Section 264 for interest rejected on 30 April 2004; writ petition filed in 2004; judgment delivered on 16 June 2023.

Acts & Sections

  • Income Tax Act, 1961: Section 244, Section 244A, Section 264, Section 143(3), Section 68, Section 271(1)(c)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Non-Prosecution and Non-Payment of Court Fees in Copyright Dispute Over Film Script. Plaintiff failed to pay deficit court fee of Rs.2,50,000 and did not prosecute the suit after interim relief was denied.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Anonymous Donations Tax Case — Hundi Collections of Religious-Cum-Charitable Trust Held Taxable Under Section 115BBC(1). The court ruled that a trust registered under Section 80G cannot claim the exception...