Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Denial of Interest on Refund Under Section 214 of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Held That Interest Is Mandatory and Must Be Paid on Entire Refund Amount from Date of Payment of Advance Tax.

High Court: Bombay High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 118
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, M/s. Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 14.6.1988 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax, Bombay City II, regarding the assessment years 1982-1983 and 1983-1984. The petitioner had filed a return of income for A.Y. 1982-1983 declaring a loss of Rs.23,82,75,310/-, having already paid advance tax of Rs.6,30,00,000/- and tax deducted at source of Rs.8,44,150/-. On 5.6.1984, the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner computed the total income at Rs.7,93,48,600/- and determined a refund of Rs.1,19,78,111/- with interest of Rs.31,14,306/- under Section 214 and charged interest of Rs.4,80,000/- under Section 216. The total refund was Rs.1,46,12,470/-, part of which was adjusted against pending tax demands. On 2.7.1985, a rectification order under Section 154 was passed, granting further refund. The Commissioner later passed an order denying interest under Section 214 on the refund, which the petitioner challenged. The court held that interest under Section 214 is mandatory and must be paid on the entire refund amount from the date of payment of advance tax. The Commissioner's order was set aside, and the respondents were directed to pay interest as per law.

Headnote

A) Income Tax - Interest on Refund - Section 214 of Income Tax Act, 1961 - Mandatory Nature - The court held that interest under Section 214 is mandatory and must be paid on the entire refund amount from the date of payment of advance tax. The Commissioner's order denying interest was set aside. (Paras 1-10)

B) Income Tax - Rectification of Mistake - Section 154 of Income Tax Act, 1961 - Scope - The court held that a mistake in computation of interest under Section 214 can be rectified under Section 154, and the Commissioner's refusal to do so was erroneous. (Paras 5-8)

C) Income Tax - Advance Tax - Refund - Sections 214, 237 of Income Tax Act, 1961 - The court held that the provisions of Section 237 regarding refunds do not override the mandatory interest under Section 214. The petitioner was entitled to interest on the refund of advance tax. (Paras 6-9)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to interest under Section 214 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on the refund of advance tax for the assessment years 1982-1983 and 1983-1984, and whether the Commissioner's order denying such interest is valid.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petition, set aside the Commissioner's order dated 14.6.1988, and directed the respondents to pay interest under Section 214 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on the refund amount as per law.

Law Points

  • Interest under Section 214 of Income Tax Act
  • 1961 is mandatory
  • not discretionary
  • interest on refund must be computed from the date of payment of advance tax
  • rectification under Section 154 can be used to correct errors in computation of interest
  • Commissioner cannot deny interest by invoking Section 237 or other provisions.
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2005 LawText (BOM) (08) 261

Writ Petition No. 2777 of 1988

2005-08-10

Dr. S. Radhakrishnan, J.H. Bhatia

Mr. P. Pardiwala, Senior Counsel with Ms. Samidha Vedpathak i/by M/s. Maneksha & Sethna for the Petitioner; Dr. P. Daniel, Senior Counsel with Mr. Harishankar for the Respondents

M/s. Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd.

P.K. Gupta, Commissioner of Income Tax, Bombay City II, and Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax denying interest on refund under Section 214 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Remedy Sought

The petitioner sought quashing of the Commissioner's order dated 14.6.1988 and direction to pay interest on the refund amount.

Filing Reason

The Commissioner denied interest on the refund of advance tax for assessment years 1982-1983 and 1983-1984.

Previous Decisions

The Inspecting Assistant Commissioner had initially granted refund with interest under Section 214, but the Commissioner later passed an order denying such interest.

Issues

Whether interest under Section 214 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is mandatory or discretionary. Whether the Commissioner's order denying interest on refund is valid. Whether the petitioner is entitled to interest on the entire refund amount from the date of payment of advance tax.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioner argued that interest under Section 214 is mandatory and must be paid on the refund of advance tax. The respondents contended that the interest was not payable as per the provisions of the Act.

Ratio Decidendi

Interest under Section 214 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is mandatory and must be paid on the entire refund amount from the date of payment of advance tax. The Commissioner cannot deny such interest by invoking other provisions.

Judgment Excerpts

In this petition, the Petitioner has challenged the order dated 14.6.1988 passed by the 1st Respondent- the Commissioner of the Income Tax with regard to the Assessment Year 1982-1983 and the Assessment Year 1983-1984 for the claim of interest. The Inspecting Assistant Commissioner determined a refund of Rs.1,19,78,111/- together with the interest at Rs.31,14,306/- under Section 214 of the Income Tax Act and the amount of Rs.4,80,000/- was also charged as an interest under Section 216.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a return for A.Y. 1982-1983 on 8.10.1982. The Inspecting Assistant Commissioner passed an assessment order on 5.6.1984 granting refund with interest. A rectification order under Section 154 was passed on 2.7.1985. The Commissioner passed the impugned order on 14.6.1988 denying interest. The petitioner filed the present writ petition challenging that order.

Acts & Sections

  • Income Tax Act, 1961: 214, 216, 154, 237
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Denial of Interest on Refund Under Section 214 of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Held That Interest Is Mandatory and Must Be Paid on Entire Refund Amount from Date of Payment of Advance Tax.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal as Withdrawn in Partition Suit — Court Permits Refund of Court Fees. Appellant sought withdrawal of Regular First Appeal against dismissal of suit for declaration and partition; court allowed withdrawal and ...