Search Results for "Section 123(4)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Section 123(4)"

80 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 80 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Election Petition Appeal, Upholds High Court's Finding That No Corrupt Practices Were Committed Under Representation of the People Act, 1951. Allegations of False Statements Against Personal Character Failed as Statements Did Not Pierce the Politician to Touch the Person, and No Meeting or Attack on Party Office Were Proved.

14 Aug 1969

The case arose out of the general election to the Lok Sabha from Hapur Parliamentary Constituency in 1967. The appellant, B.P. Maurya, contested on th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Election Petitioner's Appeal and Declares Respondent Guilty of Corrupt Practice Under Section 123(4) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951. False Statement in Poster Alleging Candidate's Involvement in Smuggling and Calling Him Obnoxious Person Amounts to Statement Relating to Personal Character and Conduct Calculated to Prejudice Election Prospects.

14 Aug 1969

The present appeal arose out of an election petition filed by the appellant, Om Prakash, challenging the election of Lalchand (respondent No. 1) from ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Returned Candidate in Election Petition Under Section 123(4) of Representation of the People Act, 1951 Due to Political Criticism Not Amounting to Corrupt Practice. False Statements Allegedly Made in Election Pamphlets Did Not Breach Section 123(4) as They Were Neither False Statements of Fact Nor Touched Personal Character.

19 Nov 1968

The appeal arose from the Rajura constituency election to the Maharashtra State Legislative Assembly held in February 1967. The appellant, Guruji Shri...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 129E Customs Act, 1962 Mandating Predeposit for Appeals. Challenge to Order-in-Original Dismissed as No Hearing Opportunity Was Denied.

19 Jun 2017

The petitioners, partners of M/s Bright International, challenged the constitutional validity of Section 129E of the Customs Act, 1962, as amended by ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Section 28A Limitation in Land Acquisition Act — Three-Month Period for Redetermination of Compensation Held Constitutional. The court ruled that the three-month limitation under Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 is reasonable and does not violate Article 14 of the Constitution, as the classification between award acceptors and Section 18 reference seekers is valid.

24 Jul 2012

The petitioner, Surendrakumar Madhusudan Mor, owned land bearing Gat No.128 admeasuring 5.27 hectares at mouza Pimpri (Hatgaon), Taluka and District Y...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 129E Customs Act, 1962 Mandating Predeposit for Appeals. Challenge to Order-in-Original Dismissed as No Appeal Filed.

19 Jun 2017

The Bombay High Court disposed of two writ petitions filed by Haresh Nagindas Vora and Sachin Laxmichand Shah, partners of M/s Bright International, c...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Motor Vehicle Registration Fee Dispute — Rule 55A of MP Motor Vehicles Rules Valid. State can charge separate fee for reserved registration numbers under Section 41(6) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

26 Aug 2020

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State of Madhya Pradesh against the High Court judgment that had quashed Rule 55A of the Madhya Prad...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Encroachment Notice Under TNULB Act — Show Cause Notice Not Entertainable Under Article 226. Petitioner Failed to Establish Legal Right; Authorities Directed to Follow Procedure Under Section 128 Before Removal.

25 Mar 2026

The petitioner, Thirumalai, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a notice dated 19.01.2026 issued by the 4...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Whether Registrar NCLT Can Scrutinize Maintainability of Section 95 IBC Petition at Filing Stage. Appeal Challenges Single Judge's Order Holding E-Filing of Insolvency Petition Against Partnership Firm Void and Non-Est.

16 Oct 2024

The appeal arose from a writ petition filed by M/s Manyata Reallty, a partnership firm, challenging the e-filing of a petition under Section 95 of the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment to Plaint in Suit for Specific Performance — Period of Bona Fide Prosecution of Earlier Proceedings Excluded for Limitation Under Section 14 of Limitation Act, 1963. The court permitted the plaintiff to amend the plaint to seek exclusion of time spent in prosecuting a suit and appeal in the Small Causes Court, holding that such amendment is necessary for determining the real controversy and does not change the nature of the suit.

10 May 2013

The plaintiff, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (BPCL), filed a suit for specific performance against the defendants in the Bombay High Court. The su...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)