Search Results for "Satyawati Sharma"

9 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 9 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Refers Satyawati Sharma to Larger Bench in Delhi Rent Control Eviction Case — Landlord's Bonafide Need for Non-Residential Premises Under Section 14(1)(e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958

The Supreme Court was hearing a batch of appeals arising from eviction petitions filed by landlords under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Civil Revision Application in Tenancy Dispute — Order VII Rule 11 CPC Application Properly Dismissed. Plaint Not Barred by Law as Tenancy Claim Requires Proof, Not Mere Allegation.

The applicant, Blaze Fernandes, filed a Civil Revision Application under Section 115 CPC challenging the order dated 08.03.2018 of the Civil Judge Jun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Section 13-B of East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 for NRI Landlords in Chandigarh and Punjab. Constitutional validity of provision granting immediate possession to Non-Resident Indians upheld as reasonable classification under Article 14.

The appeals were filed by tenants challenging the constitutional validity of Section 13-B of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, which g...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Orders Tenant at Sufferance to Pay Mesne Profits and Deposit Significant Sum. Tenant must compensate for continued possession post-lease expiry and comply with court directives pending final judgment.

The court judgment addresses the issue of mesne profits owed by a tenant at sufferance who continued to occupy the property after the lease expired du...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Recovery Officer's Confirmation of Private Sale. Court Holds That Once Sale Is Confirmed and Possession Delivered, Remedy Lies in Civil Suit for Damages, Not in Writ Jurisdiction Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India.

The petitioners, Shaikh Gulab Shaikh Ahmed and Ambadas Maruti Kale, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India chal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Subsequently Added Defendants Seeking Cross-Examination of Plaintiff in Civil Suit. Right to Cross-Examine Is a Valuable Right Not Lost by Delayed Joinder Under Order 18 Rule 17A of CPC.

The petitioners were subsequently added as party defendants in Special Civil Suit No.70 of 2007 on 14/9/2010. After being added, they filed their writ...