Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Subsequently Added Defendants Seeking Cross-Examination of Plaintiff in Civil Suit. Right to Cross-Examine Is a Valuable Right Not Lost by Delayed Joinder Under Order 18 Rule 17A of CPC.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 141
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners were subsequently added as party defendants in Special Civil Suit No.70 of 2007 on 14/9/2010. After being added, they filed their written statement and also moved an application (Exh.141) seeking permission to cross-examine the plaintiff, who had already been examined-in-chief. The trial court rejected this application on 15/12/2010. The petitioners challenged this order by filing a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. The High Court observed that the petitioners were added as defendants after the plaintiff's evidence was recorded, and they had no opportunity to cross-examine the plaintiff earlier. The court held that the right to cross-examine is a valuable right and cannot be denied merely because the defendants were added later. The court set aside the trial court's order and directed that the petitioners be permitted to cross-examine the plaintiff, subject to payment of costs of Rs. 1,000/- to the respondents. The writ petition was allowed with costs.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Right to Cross-Examine - Subsequent Joinder of Parties - Order 18 Rule 17A, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - The petitioners were added as defendants after the plaintiff's examination-in-chief was recorded. They sought to cross-examine the plaintiff. The trial court rejected their application. The High Court held that the right to cross-examine is a valuable right and cannot be denied merely because the defendants were added later. The court directed that the petitioners be permitted to cross-examine the plaintiff, subject to payment of costs of Rs. 1,000/-. (Paras 1-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether defendants who are subsequently added to a suit are entitled to cross-examine the plaintiff who has already been examined-in-chief.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is allowed. The impugned order dated 15/12/2010 is set aside. The petitioners are permitted to cross-examine the plaintiff subject to payment of costs of Rs. 1,000/- to the respondents.

Law Points

  • Right to cross-examine
  • subsequent joinder of parties
  • Order 18 Rule 17A CPC
  • opportunity to cross-examine
  • procedural fairness
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2011 LawText (BOM) (07) 120

Writ Petition No.1411 of 2011

2011-07-13

R.M. Savant

Mr. S.V. Purohit for petitioners, Mr. P.S. Sahare for respondent no.1(B)

Smt. Satyawati w/o Narendra Mishra and others

Vishnukumar s/o Chaatrapati Dubey (dead) through L.Rs. and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil writ petition challenging rejection of application for cross-examination of plaintiff by subsequently added defendants.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought to cross-examine the plaintiff in Special Civil Suit No.70 of 2007.

Filing Reason

The trial court rejected the petitioners' application for cross-examination on 15/12/2010.

Previous Decisions

The trial court rejected Exh.141 application on 15/12/2010.

Issues

Whether defendants added subsequently are entitled to cross-examine the plaintiff who has already been examined-in-chief.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that they were added as defendants after plaintiff's examination-in-chief and thus entitled to cross-examine. Respondents opposed the application.

Ratio Decidendi

The right to cross-examine is a valuable right and cannot be denied to a party merely because they were added subsequently. The court must ensure that all parties have a fair opportunity to cross-examine witnesses.

Judgment Excerpts

The right to cross-examine is a valuable right and cannot be denied to a party merely because they were added subsequently.

Procedural History

The petitioners were added as defendants on 14/9/2010 in Special Civil Suit No.70 of 2007. They filed written statement and application Exh.141 for cross-examination of plaintiff. The trial court rejected the application on 15/12/2010. The petitioners filed the present writ petition on 23/3/2011.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Order 18 Rule 17A
  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Allows Petition Challenging Demolition of Residential Structures Without Notice Under Gujarat Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 2012. Demolition Without Prior Notice and Hearing Violates Principles of Natura...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction Decree in Landlord-Tenant Dispute — Tenancy Validly Terminated Under Section 106 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882. Relationship of landlord and tenant established through lease agreement and rent receipts, and no...