Search Results for "Rule 77(1) proviso"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Rule 77(1) proviso"

69 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 69 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Employer's Appeal and Sets Aside Tribunal's Award in Retrenchment Case – Managerial Decision to Reorganise Business and Retrench Employees Held Bona Fide; Tribunal Cannot Question Propriety. Retrenchment in Compliance with Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 25F and West Bengal Industrial Disputes Rules, 1958 Rule 77(1); Error of Tribunal in Ignoring Bona Fide Nature of Decision Corrected via Certiorari.

27 Nov 1968

The dispute arose from the retrenchment of employees by Parry & Co. Ltd. following a policy decision to reorganise its business by emphasising manufac...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Petitions Challenging Refusal of Leave to Amend Written Statement in Vacation Suits. Defendants' Application for Amendment After Commencement of Trial Held Not Maintainable Under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC as No Satisfactory Reason for Delay Was Shown.

28 Jun 2011

The Bombay High Court at Goa dismissed two writ petitions filed by the defendants in Special Civil Suit Nos.23/2010/B and 24/2010/B, challenging a com...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Civil Revision Application Challenging Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Trust Dispute Under Maharashtra Trust Act. Application Under Order VII Rule 11(d) of CPC Alleges Bar of Suit by Sections 22, 50, 51, 70 of Maharashtra Trust Act, 1950.

10 Jul 2019

The dispute centered on the expulsion of two trustees from a trust registered under the Maharashtra Trust Act, 1950. The applicants, comprising ten in...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in IBC Section 7 Case — Procedural Defect of Affidavit Date Not Fatal. The Court held that a discrepancy between the date of verification and the date of affidavit in a Section 7 application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 is a curable defect and does not warrant rejection at the threshold.

24 Nov 2025

The case involves an appeal by Appellant (the corporate debtor) against Respondent (the financial creditor) concerning the rejection of the bank's app...

High Court

KAHC030020522019_1

22 Dec 2020

...

High Court

KAHC030038572012_1

22 Dec 2020

...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows Appeal Against Remand Order in Encroachment Suit — Remand Order Set Aside for Exceeding Appellate Powers Under Order 41 Rule 23 CPC. The First Appellate Court's order reversing trial court's dismissal and remanding for fresh trial was held to be without jurisdiction as the suit was not disposed of on a preliminary point.

20 Dec 2019

The case arises from a suit for removal of encroachment and possession filed by the respondent (original plaintiff) against the appellant (original de...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Order for Violation of Mandatory Procedure Under Section 144B of Income Tax Act, 1961. Failure to Provide Personal Hearing and Proper Opportunity to Respond Renders Assessment Order a Nullity.

7 Mar 2025

The petitioner, Madhuri Sameer Gokhale, an individual homemaker, challenged the reassessment order dated 29 March 2022 passed by the National Faceless...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging PMLA Provisional Attachment Order — Petitioner Failed to Establish Prima Facie Case for Interim Relief. Court Held That Attachment of Proceeds of Crime Under Section 5 of PMLA Does Not Require Prior Adjudication and Petitioner's Claim of Innocent Ownership Requires Evidence at Adjudication Stage.

2 Jun 2026

The petitioner, Smt. Jayamma, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the provisional attachment ord...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Civil Appeal in Family Settlement Admissibility Case - Unregistered Kharurunama and Receipt Admissible as Corroborative Evidence. The Court held that if a family settlement document merely records a pre-existing oral agreement, it does not require registration under Section 17(1)(b) of the Registration Act, 1908 and can be used as evidence for collateral purposes, remanding the matter for trial court determination.

1 Oct 2021

The Supreme Court of India heard a civil appeal arising from a special leave petition, concerning the admissibility of an unregistered family settleme...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)