Search Results for "Rule 34A"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Rule 34A"

16 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 16 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Market Fee on Confectionery and Food Drinks Under APMC Act. Confectionery and Food Drinks Are Not 'Agricultural Produce' Under Section 2(a) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963, and Hence Not Subject to Market Fee.

18 Aug 2017

The petitioner, Cadbury India Limited, a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1956, manufactures confectionery and food drinks at its ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes ITAT Order Rejecting Rectification Application as Time-Barred — Limitation Runs from Receipt of Order Under Rule 34A of ITAT Rules, 1963. The Court held that the six-month period under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for filing a rectification application runs from the date of receipt of the order, not the date of the order, because the applicant must file a certified copy of the order under Rule 34A read with Rule 9 of the Income Tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963.

1 Dec 2025

The Petitioner, Accost Media LLP, filed a Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 13 October 2025 passed by the Income T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision and Allows Writ Petition in Eviction Suit — Tenant's Application for Leave to Contest Rejected Due to Non-Deposit of Rent Under Section 13(4) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. The court held that the requirement of depositing rent under Section 13(4) is mandatory and a condition precedent for obtaining leave to contest, and that an order rejecting leave to contest is revisable under Section 13(5) of the Act.

14 Sep 2018

The judgment concerns two connected proceedings: a Civil Revision Application filed by the landlords (Prakash G. Goyal and others) challenging the tri...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Forest Land Encroachment Notices Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code and Forest Act. Petitioners Failed to Establish Title or Authorisation for Construction on Government Forest Land.

24 Dec 2025

The petitioners, nine individuals, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging notices issued by the Deputy Conservator of Forests ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Company in Agricultural Marketing Act Case — Processed Goods Not Covered. Notification Adding Sugar, Dry Fruits, and Edible Oils to Schedule Under Section 62 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963 Held Ultra Vires.

16 Jun 2006

The petitioner, Britannia Industries Limited, a public company with its registered office in Calcutta and a branch in Bombay, filed a writ petition un...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Forest Department's Notice on Private Forest Land. Held that lands restored under Section 22A of Maharashtra Private Forests (Acquisition) Act, 1975 retain status of reserved forest under Indian Forest Act, 1927.

3 Feb 2015

The Petitioner, Sinhagad Technical Education Society, claimed ownership of lands bearing Gat Nos. 310 and 311 at village Kusgaon Budruk, Taluka Maval,...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Plaint in Civil Suit Due to Failure to Seek Necessary Declarations Under Specific Relief Act. The suit was barred under Section 34 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, as the plaintiff admitted executing sale deeds as security but did not seek declarations regarding their validity, leading to rejection under Order 7 Rule 11(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, with no amendment permitted after rejection.

20 Jul 2021

The dispute originated from a suit filed by the plaintiff (appellant) against multiple defendants (respondents) concerning property transactions and a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Minister's Revision Order in Land Record Dispute — Restoration of Revenue Entries Directed. The Court held that the Minister exceeded jurisdiction under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 by entertaining a revision against an order that had attained finality.

22 Apr 2026

The petitioner, Rama s/o Gunda Malkapure, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging an order dated 06.06.2017 ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act Provisions for Election Disqualification of Directors for Default in Loan Repayment. The Court held that Section 73AB and 73B of the MCS Act, 1960, which disqualify directors for default in repayment of loans, are not ultra vires the Constitution and are reasonable restrictions under Article 19(1)(g) and Article 14.

31 Dec 2025

The case involves a batch of civil appeals challenging the constitutional validity of Sections 73AB and 73B of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Petition Challenging Quashing of Chargesheet Against Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax for Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC. Disciplinary proceedings initiated without prior sanction under Section 197(1) CrPC are invalid as the officer was not removable from service except by the State Government.

23 Aug 2006

The State of Maharashtra and other petitioners challenged the judgment of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal dated 18th June 1999 in Original App...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)