Search Results for "Rule 17(11)"

10 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 10 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court's Interim Order Restraining Filing of Charge-Sheet in Property Dispute Case. The Court held that the High Court cannot restrain filing of charge-sheet under Section 193(3) BNSS while a quashment petition is pending, as it affects the statutory right of investigation.

The Supreme Court set aside an interim order of the Allahabad High Court that restrained the investigating officer from filing the charge-sheet in a c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenants' Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Order Under Goa Rent Act. Landlord's Bonafide Need for Personal Occupation Upheld as Genuine and Based on Evidence.

The petitioners, Michael Anthony William Gareth and Amelia Gareth, were tenants in a house bearing Municipal no. 73, Panaji, Goa, which was acquired b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Domicile Requirement for MBBS Admission in State Quota. NEET-UG 2013 Rules Requiring SSC and HSC from Maharashtra Institution Are Valid and Not Ultra Vires Articles 14, 15, 21, 29(2) of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Shubham Gaddalay, a minor represented by his mother Dr. Sunanda Gaddalay, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in Property Dispute — Suit Barred by Limitation Under Order 7 Rule 11(d) CPC. Clause 10 of Agreement for Sale Dated 31-03-1957 Was a Right of Re-Conveyance, Not a Contract for Sale, and Cause of Action Arose in 1988.

The appellant, Kishorbhai Premchand Shah, filed a civil suit in the City Civil Court, Mumbai, seeking a declaration of ownership and permanent injunct...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in Suit for Specific Performance — Suit Barred by Limitation. The court held that the plaint must be rejected under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC when the suit is clearly barred by limitation based on the averments in the plaint.

The appellant, Romesh Satyanarayan Sharma, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 15.07.2005 against the respondents, Mrs...