Search Results for "Retiral benefits"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Retiral benefits"

501 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 501 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Pension Rules Case Regarding Withholding of Gratuity During Pending Criminal Proceedings. Court Upholds Statutory Embargo Under Rule 69(1)(c) of Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972, Holding That Gratuity Cannot Be Paid While Either Departmental or Judicial Proceedings Remain Pending.

7 Apr 2026

The appeal concerned a retired government employee whose gratuity was withheld due to pending criminal proceedings against him. The appellant had work...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Zilla Parishad to Pay Retired Employee Gratuity and Commutation Amount with Interest for Delayed Payment. Non-payment of retiral benefits after superannuation violates Article 300A of the Constitution and Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961.

15 Sep 2015

The petitioner, Motilal s/o Babulal More, retired from the services of the Zilla Parishad, Nandurbar on 31st May 2013 upon attaining the age of supera...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs University to Pay Pension to Retired Research Officer After 5-Year Delay. University's Denial of Employment Rejected Based on Appointment Order and Service Records.

2 Dec 2025

The Petitioner, Mrs. Sushama C. Pendharkar, was appointed as a Research Officer by Pune University (now Savitribai Phule Pune University) vide appoint...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Payment of Gratuity and Provident Fund to Retired Employee in Service Law Case — Employer's Denial Based on Pending Criminal Proceedings Without Departmental Inquiry Held Unjustified. Statutory Right to Gratuity Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Cannot Be Withheld Without Disciplinary Proceedings, and Provident Fund Being Employee's Own Contribution Cannot Be Withheld.

29 Nov 2017

The petitioner, Sayyed Shabbir s/o Sayyed Karim, a retired employee of the Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB), filed a writ petition under Art...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Adjudicates Writ Petitions Filed by Retired Employees of Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran Seeking Pension and Retirement Benefits. The Court Examined the Claim for Pension and Other Dues Under Relevant Service Regulations.

17 Apr 2025

The petitioners, Prakash Narayan Dhobale and Krishnakumar Nathu Pate, both retired employees of Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran, filed writ petitions b...

High Court

High Court Directs Municipal Council to Consider Retiral Benefits of Employee Who Voluntarily Retired on Medical Grounds. The court held that the respondent's rejection of voluntary retirement due to contemplated departmental enquiry and alleged abandonment of service does not disentitle the petitioner from retiral benefits.

26 Jul 2017

The petitioner, Prakash Hiralal Sone, was appointed as an Accountant in the Municipal Council, Arvi, on 01.12.1969 and confirmed on 09.07.1970. After ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows LIC's Appeal Against Resigned Employee's Pension Claim — Resignation Not Voluntary Retirement Under Pension Rules. Employee Who Resigned Before Pension Scheme Notification Not Entitled to Retrospective Benefits Under LIC Pension Rules, 1995.

15 Mar 2019

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals concerning employees of the Life Insurance Corporation of India, United India Insurance Company Limite...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows LIC Appeal, Denies Pension to Resigned Employee Under Retrospective Pension Rules. Resignation Forfeits Past Service Under Rule 23 of LIC Pension Rules, 1995, and Cannot Be Equated with Voluntary Retirement.

15 Mar 2019

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals concerning employees of the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC), United India Insurance Company ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Employer in Pension Dispute, Holding Resignation Forfeits Past Service. Employee Who Resigned Before Pension Rules Came Into Force Not Entitled to Pensionary Benefits Despite Completing 22 Years of Service.

5 Dec 2019

The case involves an appeal by BSES Yamuna Power Ltd. against a Delhi High Court judgment granting pensionary benefits to the first respondent, Ghansh...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Pensionary Benefits to Deceased Employee's Legal Heirs in Delhi Transport Corporation Case — Resignation After 30 Years of Service Does Not Forfeit Pension Under Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972. Employee's Long Service and Liberal Construction of Resignation Letter Entitle Him to Pension and Other Retiral Benefits Despite Resignation.

9 Dec 2025

The case involves an appeal by the legal heirs of Appellants, a deceased employee of Delhi Transport Corporation (DTC), against the denial of pensiona...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)