Search Results for "Restoration of Appeal"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Restoration of Appeal"

28 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 28 result(s)

Tribunals

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Allows Second Appeal Against Dismissal of Appeal Due to Delay, Subject to Payment of Costs. Delay of 137 days condoned on condition of paying Rs. 40,000 to complainant and depositing Rs. 10,000 in Legal Aid Account.

24 Sep 2025

The case pertains to a second appeal filed by Ageas Federal Life Insurance Company against the order of the Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal C...

Tribunals

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Allows Second Appeal and Remits Case to State Commission for Non-Prosecution Dismissal — Petitioner Granted Conditional Restoration Subject to Deposit of Rs. 5,000/- in Legal Aid Account. The appeal was dismissed due to failure to clear defects, and the National Commission set aside the dismissal order and restored the appeal subject to a cost condition.

12 Sep 2025

The case involves a second appeal before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) filed by Mohd. Faizan against The Oriental Insura...

Tribunals

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Allows Second Appeal in Consumer Dispute — Condonation of Delay Granted Subject to Payment of Costs. Delay in Filing Documents Before State Commission Condoned and Appeal Restored Under Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

29 Jul 2025

The case involves a second appeal before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) filed by Smt. Alpana Shisodiya and Raj Singh Siso...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Expunges Adverse Remarks Against Appellant in Civil Appeal Over Delay Condonation and Review Application. The Court held that remarks by the High Court were unwarranted and directed their expunction, while also examining the restoration of a Second Appeal and imposition of costs under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

25 Apr 2023

The Supreme Court dealt with appeals arising from Special Leave Petitions challenging a High Court judgment that included adverse remarks against the ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Restoration of First Appeal Dismissed in Default, Emphasizes Liberal Construction of Procedural Law to Advance Substantial Justice. The Court held that an order refusing to readmit an appeal under Order 41 Rule 19 CPC is appealable under Order 43 Rule 1(t) CPC, and that the application disclosed sufficient cause for restoration.

5 Feb 2019

The appeal arose from a civil suit filed by the respondent (plaintiff) against the appellant, Mysore Urban Development Authority (defendant), seeking ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Second Appeal in Eviction Case Due to Procedural Violation of Order 41 Rule 17 CPC. First Appellate Court Dismissed Appeal on Merits Despite Appellant's Absence, Which Is Impermissible Under Law.

22 Jan 2016

The case involves a second appeal filed by the appellant, Smt. Nayan alias Chandrakala Chandrakant Borkar, challenging the judgment and order dated 30...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Restoration of Appeal Dismissed in Default Due to Advocate's Absence, Imposing Costs on Appellants. Mistake of Advocate Should Not Prejudice Party; Section 5 of Limitation Act Applied to Advance Substantial Justice.

11 Nov 2014

The appellants, Devkisan Onkardas Bhutada and Gopal Devkisan Bhutada, had filed Regular Civil Appeal No. 80/08 against the judgment and decree in Regu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Restoration of Consumer Appeal Dismissed in Default Due to Advocate's Absence. State Commission Lacks Power to Recall DID Order; High Court Exercises Writ Jurisdiction to Set Aside Order and Restore Appeal for Fresh Hearing on Merits.

2 Apr 2014

The petitioner, Arun Modale, had filed a First Appeal No. 481/2009 before the Maharashtra State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (State Commissio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Restoration of Appeal Dismissed for Non-Prosecution by ITAT — Rule 24 of ITAT Rules Does Not Confer Power to Dismiss Appeal for Default in Absence of Notice of Hearing. The Court Held That the Tribunal Must Hear the Appellant Before Dismissing the Appeal and Has Inherent Power to Restore It.

23 Oct 2013

The petitioner, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Dismissal of Restoration Application in Civil Appeal — Delay Not Sufficiently Explained. The Court held that the Appellants failed to show sufficient cause for condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, as the explanation for the 96-day delay in filing the restoration application was unsatisfactory.

28 Mar 2005

The Appellants, Dattaram Keshav Aroskar and others, filed an appeal from order (Appeal from Order No.78 of 2005) in the Bombay High Court challenging ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)