Bombay High Court on Slum Evictions: Contractual Disputes to Be Raised Separately
19 Jan 2026The Petitioner filed a writ petition challenging eviction orders passed by the Slum Rehabilitation Authority and the Apex Grievance Redressal Committe...
Search Results for "Rehabilitation agreement"
288 result(s) found
Found 288 result(s)
High Court
Land: Basilica of Our Lady of the Mount Challenges SRA's Acquisition Attempt. Protecting Property Rights and Redevelopment Plans in Mumbai's Slum Rehabilitation Dispute
11 Jun 2024Maharashtra Slum Rehabilitation Authority (SRA) Act, where the petitioner, Basilica of Our Lady of the Mount, Mumbai, contests SRA's attempt to acquir...
- 461
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Approves Compensation Scheme for Tribal Landowners in Coal Mining Acquisition - Mahanadi Coalfields Directed to Pay Compensation for Lands Acquired in 1987-1989. Market value determined as of 2010 survey date due to 28-year delay in compensation.
3 Nov 2022The case concerns the long-pending compensation claims of landowners, predominantly tribal communities, whose lands were acquired for coal mining by M...
- 120
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Slum Rehabilitation Authority's Cancellation of Letter of Intent for Non-Compliance. SRA's Power to Revoke LoI for Failure to Obtain 70% Consent and Complete Rehabilitation Upheld.
6 Jul 2017The petitioners, M/s. Platinum Realty and M/s. Jaihind SRA Cooperative Society (Proposed), filed a writ petition challenging the decision of the Slum ...
- 70
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to SRA Committee's Order on Slum Dweller Eligibility. The Court upheld the High Power Committee's jurisdiction to determine eligibility for rehabilitation under the Slum Rehabilitation Scheme, rejecting the petitioners' claim for inclusion of additional tenants.
10 Feb 2015The case involves two writ petitions filed by Housing Development and Infrastructure Ltd. and another challenging the order of the High Power Committe...
- 81
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Sections 14 and 17 of Maharashtra Slum Act in Land Acquisition Challenge. Challenge to Acquisition Under Section 14 and Award Under Section 17 Rejected as Provisions Held Intra Vires Constitution.
16 Jan 2015The petitioners, Nenshi Monji (Bombay), a Family Trust and Others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the acquisi...
- 102
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Specific Performance of Slum Development Agreement Due to Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 42 of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act. Civil Court Cannot Entertain Disputes Relating to Slum Rehabilitation Schemes as Exclusive Jurisdiction Vests with Slum Authorities.
30 Oct 2014The plaintiff, Lokhandwala Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for specific performance of a development agreement dated 10 August 2003, entered in...
- 134
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Appeal in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute — Upholds Single Judge's Refusal of Ad-Interim Relief. Court holds that a developer cannot claim exclusive right to implement a slum rehabilitation scheme when there is a rival claim by another developer and the slum dwellers' association has the right to choose the developer.
7 May 2011The appellant, M/s Lokhandwala Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., filed two appeals against the judgment and order dated 5th April 2011 passed by the learned S...
- 12
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Slum Rehabilitation Scheme Approval — No Violation of Natural Justice Found as Petitioners Were Given Opportunity of Hearing. The court declined to interfere in writ jurisdiction as the challenge involved disputed questions of fact and the petitioners had an alternative remedy of appeal under the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971.
23 Feb 2011The petitioners, Shri Atesham Ahmed Khan and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the approval of a slum rehabilitat...
- 38
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to SRA Order in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme. CEO's Direction to Process Letter of Intent Upheld as 70% Consent of Eligible Members Was Validly Obtained Under DCR 33(10).
28 Jan 2011The case involves a slum rehabilitation scheme under DCR 33(10) of the Development Control Regulations for Greater Mumbai. The petitioners, Lokhandwal...
- 48
