Search Results for "Regular Promotion"

442 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 442 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Service Law Case — Notional Financial Benefits Upheld Despite No Actual Promotion. Rule 54(1)(a) of West Bengal Service Rules Precludes Retrospective Promotion but Notional Benefits Granted Due to Administrative Delay.

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the High Court at Calcutta which upheld an order of the West Bengal Administrative Tribunal directing tha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Seniority Dispute Over Catch-Up Rule for Reserved Category Promotions. Consequential Seniority for Scheduled Caste Promotee Upheld as Regular Promotion Not Fortuitous.

The case involves a seniority dispute between two officers of the Government of Maharashtra: Sudhakar Baburao Nangnure (appellant, open category) and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Zone of Consideration for Scheduled Tribes Promotion in Electricity Department — Seniority-Based Zone of Consideration Upheld as Valid Methodology for Promotion from Junior Engineer to Assistant Engineer.

The judgment pertains to a writ petition filed by eight petitioners who were working as Junior Engineers in the Electricity Department of the Governme...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Transfer Order of Government Officer in Town Planning Department — Upholds State's Power of Transfer as an Incident of Service. Transfer Order Issued in Public Interest and Not Vitiated by Malafides or Violation of Statutory Rules.

The petitioner, Shri Noreshwar Raghunathrao Shende, was serving as Director of Town Planning, Maharashtra State, Pune. He was transferred to the post ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Government Engineer Seeking Antedated Promotion. Petitioner's claim for regular promotion from 2004 rejected as ad-hoc promotion in 2005 did not confer right to retrospective regularisation.

The petitioner, Shri S. Lekshmanan, was appointed as Junior Engineer (Electrical) on 04.06.1979 and promoted to Assistant Engineer on 15.07.1996. He c...