Search Results for "Recovery of excess pay"

8 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 8 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Quashes Recovery Order Against Employee in Pay Fixation Dispute. Recovery of Excess Pay for Over Five Years Without Employee's Fault Held Impermissible Under Article 226 of the Constitution, Applying Rafiq Masih.

The writ petition was filed by a Sheristadar working under the Subordinate Judge, Tirukoilur, challenging an office order for recovery of excess pay a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Subordinate Judge’s Return of Refund Application in Pay Refixation and Recovery Matter. Holds that Once Recovery Order is Quashed, the Natural Consequence is Refund of Amounts Already Recovered, Independent of Confirmed Pay Refixation.

The dispute arose from pay refixation and subsequent recovery of alleged excess payments from a court employee. The petitioner’s pay was refixed und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Partly Allows Writ Petition Quashing Recovery of Excess Pay from Government Employee; Holds Recovery After Long Delay Without Misrepresentation Impermissible Under Rafiq Masih Principles, Confirms Pay Revision and Directs Refund of Amount Recovered.

The case arose from a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by D. Sivakumar, a government employee working as Central Naz...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Disposes Writ Petition Challenging Show Cause Notice for Recovery of Excess Pay from Retired Employee. Recovery of Excess Salary Barred as per Rafiq Masih Principles Due to Long Delay and Hardship, but Re-fixation of Pay Permitted under Applicable Rules.

The writ petition was filed by a retired judicial employee against the Sub-Judge, Principal District Judge, and the Registrar General of the High Cour...