Search Results for "Railway Establishment Code"

92 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 92 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Judgment Setting Aside Appellate Authority Order Under Madhya Pradesh Shops & Establishments Act, 1958. The Court affirmed that clubs not being residential clubs are exempt from the Act under Section 3(j), rendering the Appellate Authority's reinstatement order invalid.

The dispute arose from the termination of services of the appellants, who were employees at a club run by the respondents. The appellants filed a comp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Reinstatement of Contract Labourers in SAIL Mines Despite Finding Contract Genuine. High Court's Direction for Regularisation Consideration Under Para 125 of SAIL Judgment Affirmed, Back Wages Denied.

The case involves a long-standing industrial dispute between the Steel Authority of India Ltd. (SAIL), a government undertaking, and the Ispat Khadan ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Tribunal's Order for Payment of Subsistence Allowance to Suspended Railway Employee. Employer's Failure to Pay Subsistence Allowance During Suspension Period Renders Subsequent Disciplinary Proceedings Invalid.

The Union of India, through the Chief Workshop Manager of Central Railway, Parel, Mumbai, filed two writ petitions challenging orders of the Central G...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Transfer of Group A Railway Officer — Transfer Order Upheld as Administrative Necessity. Petitioner's All India Service Liability and Lack of Malice Justify Transfer Under Railway Establishment Rules.

The petitioner, Naresh K. Gupta, a Group A officer serving as Ex-Chief Engineer (Construction and Survey) at the Western Railway Headquarters in Mumba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Indian Railways' Appeals, Upholds Its Status as Deemed Distribution Licensee Under Electricity Act, 2003. Railways Not Liable to Pay Cross-Subsidy Surcharge for Open Access as It Is Not a Consumer Under Section 2(15) of the Electricity Act, 2003.

The Supreme Court of India allowed the appeals filed by Indian Railways against the judgment of the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL) dated 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Doctor Denied Promotion in Indian Railway Medical Service Due to Inadequate Grading. Selection Committee's Assessment of Annual Confidential Reports Held to Be Objective and Not Vitiated by Bias or Arbitrariness.

The appellant, Dr. Indira Saranath, was a doctor in the Indian Railway Medical Service (IRMS). She sought promotion to the post of Chief Medical Direc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court's Interpretation of Article 131: Federal Disputes and Legal Rights. A detailed analysis of the Supreme Court's jurisdiction under Article 131, focusing on federalism, state consent, and the role of the CBI within Indian constitutional law.

The maintainability of a suit filed by the State of West Bengal against the Union of India under Article 131 of the Indian Constitution, challenging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Mandamus Directing Finalization of RPF as Organized Service. In-Principle Approval by DoPT Was Conditional and Subject to Cadre Review Committee Approval, Which Was Not Granted.

The Supreme Court disposed of a batch of appeals filed by the Union of India against judgments of the Delhi High Court that had directed the governmen...