Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition by Union of India in Railway Service Matter — Ex-Cadre Posting Policy for Production Control Organisation Upheld. Court held that employees in S&T Workshop, Podanur were entitled to ex-cadre status and special pay as per Railway Board proceedings dated 13.09.1984.

High Court: Madras High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 46
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The writ petition was filed by the Union of India and other railway authorities challenging the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chennai, dated 17.11.2023 in O.A.No.310/00432/2021. The respondents were permanent en-cadre employees at the S&T Workshop, Podanur. The dispute centered on the status of posts in the Production Control Organisation (PCO) at the workshop. Initially, by proceedings dated 09.04.1980, the PCO post was treated as an en-cadre post. However, the Railway Board by proceedings dated 13.09.1984 evolved a procedure making it an ex-cadre post on tenure basis, with a tenure of five years and eligibility for special pay. The Southern Railway allowed the en-cadreing to continue, but a conscious decision was later taken to extend ex-cadreing to all PCOs except S&T Workshop, Podanur. The respondents contended that they were entitled to ex-cadre status and special pay. The Tribunal allowed their application, and the petitioners sought to quash that order. The High Court, after hearing arguments, dismissed the writ petition, upholding the Tribunal's order. The court reasoned that the Railway Board's proceedings applied uniformly and the exception for S&T Workshop was not justified. The decision favored the respondents (employees).

Headnote

A) Service Law - Ex-cadre Post - Production Control Organisation - Railway Board Proceedings dated 13.09.1984 - The issue pertained to whether posts in the Production Control Organisation (PCO) at S&T Workshop, Podanur, should be treated as ex-cadre posts on tenure basis, entitling employees to special pay. The court upheld the Tribunal's order, holding that the Railway Board's decision to treat PCO posts as ex-cadre applied to all workshops including S&T Workshop, Podanur, and the petitioners' contention that it was an en-cadre post was not sustainable. (Paras 3-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chennai, in O.A.No.310/00432/2021 dated 17.11.2023, which upheld the ex-cadre status of employees in the Production Control Organisation at S&T Workshop, Podanur, is liable to be quashed.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition was dismissed. The order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chennai, in O.A.No.310/00432/2021 dated 17.11.2023 was upheld.

Law Points

  • Service Law
  • Ex-cadre Post
  • En-cadre Post
  • Tenure Basis
  • Special Pay
  • Railway Board Proceedings
  • Central Administrative Tribunal
  • Writ of Certiorari
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (MAD) (02) 25

Writ Petition No.25137 of 2024 & WMP.No.27457 of 2024

2026-02-27

C.V. Karthikeyan, K.Kumaresh Babu

Mr.AR.L.Sundaresan ASGI assisted by Mr.V.Chandrasekaran for petitioners, Mr.K.Manickaraj for respondents

Union of India, Rep., by The Chairman, Railway Board, New Delhi; The General Manager, Southern Railway, Chennai; The Principal Chief Personnel Officer, Southern Railway, Chennai; The Principal Chief Signal & Tele Communication Engineer, Southern Railway, Chennai; The Chief Workshop Manager, S&T Workshop, Southern Railway, Podanur, Coimbatore

C.Sasikumar, M.Sakthivel, J.Rengarajan, V.Ragunathan, S.Gnanaraj, N.Gurumurthy, P.Raghunath, F.Joseph Christopher, T.Abish, V.V.Anilkumar, P.M.Immanuel, C.R.Mahalingam, P.Predip, P.Ravichandran, M.M.Sunil, R.Gopakumar, V.Guhan, B.Madhan, K.Ganesan, Y.Yesudass

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chennai.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners (Union of India and railway authorities) sought a Writ of Certiorari to quash the Tribunal's order dated 17.11.2023 in O.A.No.310/00432/2021.

Filing Reason

The petitioners challenged the Tribunal's order which allowed the respondents' application regarding ex-cadre status and special pay for employees in the Production Control Organisation at S&T Workshop, Podanur.

Previous Decisions

The Central Administrative Tribunal, Chennai, by order dated 17.11.2023 in O.A.No.310/00432/2021, allowed the respondents' application.

Issues

Whether the posts in the Production Control Organisation at S&T Workshop, Podanur, should be treated as ex-cadre posts on tenure basis as per Railway Board proceedings dated 13.09.1984.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the PCO post was initially en-cadre and later ex-cadreing was extended to all PCOs except S&T Workshop, Podanur. Respondents contended that they were entitled to ex-cadre status and special pay as per the Railway Board proceedings.

Ratio Decidendi

The Railway Board proceedings dated 13.09.1984 uniformly applied to all workshops, and the exception for S&T Workshop, Podanur was not justified. Therefore, the employees were entitled to ex-cadre status and special pay.

Judgment Excerpts

The learned Additional Solicitor General of India appearing for the petitioners would submit that the respondents are all En-cadre employees on permanent basis at S&T Workshop, Podanur. The Railway Board by its proceedings dated 13.09.1984, had evolved a procedure by which the post in the PCO would be an Ex-cadre post, so as to draw Shop floor staffs as per requirement on tenure basis.

Procedural History

The respondents filed O.A.No.310/00432/2021 before the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chennai, which was allowed on 17.11.2023. The petitioners then filed the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging that order.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition by Union of India in Railway Service Matter — Ex-Cadre Posting Policy for Production Control Organisation Upheld. Court held that employees in S&T Workshop, Podanur were entitled to ex-cadre status and spec...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Goa Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declaration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Dying Declaration Suffered from Material Inconsistencies and Was Not Supported by Medical Evidence.