Search Results for "Quashing of Summons"

11 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 11 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Summons in Seeds Act Case for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Sampling Procedure. Failure to Give Notice Under Rule 7(1) of Seeds Rules, 1968 Before Drawing Sample Renders Prosecution Invalid.

The petitioners, Vishwas Pandhari Khuje, Rajendra Bhikanrao Deshmukh, and Ramdas Dnyandev Kadam, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes Summons in Medical Negligence Case for Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC — Doctor and Hospital Manager Protected as Public Servants Under Section 2(c) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The case involves two criminal writ petitions filed by Dr. Vivekanand Jawali (a cardiac surgeon) and Mr. Karthik Rajagopal (Zonal Director of Fortis H...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Summons Under Section 319 Cr.P.C. Against Petitioners in Absence of Sufficient Evidence During Trial. Court Held That Magistrate Cannot Summon Accused Based Solely on Complainant's Examination-in-Chief Without Cross-Examination or Corroborative Material.

The petitioners, who were originally named in the FIR but left out in the charge sheet, challenged the order of the II Additional Senior Civil Judge a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Summons in Cheating Case for Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction and Non-Disclosure of Offence. The court held that the Magistrate at Indore had no jurisdiction as no cause of action arose there, and the complaint did not disclose any offence under Sections 420 or 406 IPC.

The petitioners challenged the summons issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Indore under Sections 420 or 406 read with Section 120-B ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Summons in Defamation Case Against Newspaper Publisher and Editor for Reporting FIR — Reporting of Police Press Release Constitutes Fair Comment and Substantial Truth Under Exception 1 to Section 499 IPC.

The petitioners, Manish Karapurkar (Publisher) and K. R. Sreenivas (Editor) of The Times of India, Goa Edition, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Summons in Cheque Dishonour Cases for Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. Magistrate at Mumbai had no jurisdiction as no part of cause of action arose within its territorial limits under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The Bombay High Court considered a group of applications under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of process issued...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Witness Summons Against Senior Advocate in Professional Communication Privilege Case. Communication Between Advocate and Client Held Privileged Under Section 126 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Cannot Be Compelled to Be Produced.

The petitioner, a designated Senior Advocate of the Bombay High Court, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challengin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Quash Summons in Partnership Dispute — Allegations of Cheating and Criminal Breach of Trust Under Sections 420, 406 IPC. Court holds that prima facie case exists for trial, refusing to interfere with lower court orders.

The petitioners, Ramesh Dadarao Bagdure and Omprakash Satyanrayan Baheti, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Benc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Quashing Summons Issued Under Section 126 BNSS for Non-Compliance with Procedural Safeguards. The Court Holds That Executive Magistrate Must First Pass Order Under Section 130 BNSS Before Issuing Summons.

The writ petition before the High Court of Karnataka challenged the summons dated 30.09.2025 issued by the Executive Magistrate (Respondent No.3) unde...