Bombay High Court Quashes Summons in Defamation Case Against Newspaper Publisher and Editor for Reporting FIR — Reporting of Police Press Release Constitutes Fair Comment and Substantial Truth Under Exception 1 to Section 499 IPC.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: GOA In Favour of Accused
  • 67
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, Manish Karapurkar (Publisher) and K. R. Sreenivas (Editor) of The Times of India, Goa Edition, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Section 482 CrPC challenging the order of the Additional Sessions Judge, North Goa, which dismissed their revision application and confirmed the summons issued by the Judicial Magistrate First Class in a defamation complaint filed by the respondents, Antonio Braganza and Aldila Braganza. The defamation complaint arose from a news article published on 16th July 2016, reporting that an FIR had been lodged against the respondents by one Antoneto D'Souza for alleged cheating and criminal breach of trust. The petitioners argued that the news item was based on a press release issued by the Calangute Police Station and the FIR itself, and thus fell within Exception 1 to Section 499 IPC (truth for public good). The respondents contended that the publication was defamatory and malicious. The court examined the contents of the FIR, the press release, and the news article, and found that the publication was a faithful reproduction of the police press release and the FIR, which were matters of public record. The court held that the petitioners had acted in good faith and for public good, as the public had a right to know about the registration of an FIR. The court further held that the ingredients of defamation were not made out, and continuing the proceedings would be an abuse of the process of court. Accordingly, the court allowed the petition, quashed the summons, and set aside the orders of the courts below.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Defamation - Exception 1 to Section 499 IPC - Fair Comment - The publication of a news item based on a police press release and FIR, which is substantially true and made in good faith for public good, falls within Exception 1 to Section 499 IPC and does not constitute defamation. The court held that the petitioners had merely reported the contents of the FIR and press release, and there was no intention to harm the reputation of the complainant. (Paras 5-10)

B) Criminal Procedure - Quashing of Criminal Proceedings - Section 482 CrPC - Abuse of Process - Where the allegations in the complaint do not prima facie constitute an offence and the proceedings are an abuse of the process of court, the High Court can quash the summons under Section 482 CrPC. The court held that continuing the proceedings would be a travesty of justice. (Paras 11-15)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the publication of a news item based on a police press release and FIR can constitute defamation under Section 499 IPC, and whether the criminal proceedings against the petitioners should be quashed under Section 482 CrPC.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petition, quashed the summons issued against the petitioners, and set aside the orders of the Judicial Magistrate First Class and the Additional Sessions Judge.

Law Points

  • Defamation
  • Exception 1 to Section 499 IPC
  • Fair Comment
  • Substantial Truth
  • Public Interest
  • Reporting of FIR
  • Press Release
  • Section 482 CrPC
  • Quashing of Summons
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (BOM) (12) 81

Criminal Writ Petition No. 96 of 2019

2019-12-18

Nutan D. Sardessai

Shri Arun Bras de Sa for Petitioners, Shri S.R.Rivankar for State/Respondent No.3, Respondent No.2 in person

Shri Manish karapurkar and Shri K. R. Sreenivas

Mr. Antonio Braganza, Mrs. Aldila Braganza, and State

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal Writ Petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of summons in a defamation case.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought quashing of the order of the Additional Sessions Judge dismissing their revision and confirming the summons issued by the Judicial Magistrate First Class.

Filing Reason

The petitioners were summoned as accused in a defamation complaint filed by the respondents for publishing a news article based on a police press release and FIR.

Previous Decisions

The Judicial Magistrate First Class issued summons to the petitioners. The Additional Sessions Judge dismissed the revision application filed by the petitioners, confirming the summons.

Issues

Whether the publication of a news item based on a police press release and FIR constitutes defamation under Section 499 IPC. Whether the criminal proceedings against the petitioners should be quashed under Section 482 CrPC as an abuse of process.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the news item was based on a police press release and FIR, which are matters of public record, and thus falls within Exception 1 to Section 499 IPC (truth for public good). Respondents contended that the publication was defamatory and malicious, and that the petitioners had not verified the facts.

Ratio Decidendi

The publication of a news item based on a police press release and FIR, which is substantially true and made in good faith for public good, does not constitute defamation under Section 499 IPC. Criminal proceedings based on such publication are an abuse of process and liable to be quashed under Section 482 CrPC.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioners had merely reported the contents of the FIR and press release, and there was no intention to harm the reputation of the complainant. The publication of a news item based on a police press release and FIR, which is substantially true and made in good faith for public good, falls within Exception 1 to Section 499 IPC. Continuing the proceedings would be a travesty of justice.

Procedural History

The respondents filed a defamation complaint before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, who issued summons to the petitioners. The petitioners filed a revision application before the Additional Sessions Judge, which was dismissed on 03.10.2017. The petitioners then filed the present Criminal Writ Petition under Section 482 CrPC before the High Court of Bombay at Goa.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC): 482
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 499, 500
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Grants Pre-Arrest Bail to Accused in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Intent to Insult on Caste Basis. The court held that the bar under Section 18 of the SC/ST Act does not apply when the allegations do not prima facie dis...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove motive and establish complete chain of circumstantial evidence.