Search Results for "Punjab Police Rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Punjab Police Rules"

1155 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1155 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Sub-Inspector in Police Act Case — Superintendent of Police Holds Same Authority as District Superintendent. Re-employed Deputy Superintendent of Police Qualifies as Superior Officer for Departmental Enquiry Under Punjab Police Rules, 1934.

1 Apr 1969

Background: The case concerned the dismissal of a Sub-Inspector of Police from service by the Delhi Police Force in 1949. The respondent, originally a...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Quashing of Dismissal Order in Police Departmental Inquiry Case; Non-compliance with Punjab Police Rules, 1934, Rule 16.38 Sanction Requirement Vitiates Inquiry. The Court found that the inquiry officer failed to properly obtain sanction of the District Magistrate as mandated by sub-rules (1) and (2) of Rule 16.38, rendering the subsequent departmental inquiry and dismissal order invalid.

12 Feb 1969

The case concerned a service matter arising from the dismissal of an Assistant Sub-Inspector of Police (the respondent) after a departmental inquiry. ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Police Promotion Case Under Punjab Police Rules, 1934. Inspector General's Approval is Mandatory for Finalizing Promotion List Under Rule 13.7(14), and Promotion Under 10% Quota Requires State-Level Comparative Merit Assessment Under Rule 13.7(9).

19 Jan 2022

The dispute arose from a civil appeal filed by a constable in the Haryana Police against the denial of retrospective promotion to the post of Head Con...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Reservation for Women in Government Services Under Horizontal Reservation Rules. The Court held that horizontal reservation for women under the Punjab Civil Services (Reservation of Posts for Women) Rules, 2020 is compartmentalized within vertical categories and subsequent roster amendments cannot be applied retrospectively to invalidate an advertisement issued in compliance with the rules.

9 Apr 2025

The Supreme Court considered an appeal challenging a Division Bench order of the Punjab and Haryana High Court that remanded a reservation dispute for...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Modifies High Court Order on History Sheet Surveillance, Directs Protection of Minor Relatives' Identities and Periodic Audit. Court upholds right to privacy and dignity under Article 21, mandates compliance with Juvenile Justice Act and amended Standing Order.

21 Mar 2024

The appellant filed a writ petition before the Delhi High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Pr...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Challenging DGP Appointment in Punjab, Upholds UPSC Selection Process. Appointment Valid as Empanelment Followed Supreme Court Directions in Prakash Singh Case and Draft Guidelines, with No Proven Bias or Arbitrariness.

16 Nov 2021

The dispute arose from the appointment of Mr. Dinkar Gupta as Director General of Police (Head of Police Force) for Punjab in 2019, challenged by appe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition by Police Personnel Challenging Refusal to Permit Formation of Association, Holding Restriction Valid Under Article 33(b) and Police Forces (Restriction of Rights) Act, 1966. Denial of Permission Not Violative of Article 19(1)(c) as Prior Sanction Requirement Fulfills Constitutional Safeguards and Alternative Grievance Mechanisms Exist.

16 Sep 2016

The case involved a writ petition under Article 226 filed by five police personnel from various lower ranks (Police Sub Inspector, Police Naik, Assist...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Legality of Search by Inspector In-Charge of Police Station Under Immoral Traffic Prevention Act. Court Rejects Challenge to Search in Second Writ Petition, Finding Senior Inspector as Special Police Officer Under Notification Dated 14 March 2005; Notes Unauthorised Search by Assistant Police Inspector in First Petition.

15 Oct 2016

The Bombay High Court heard two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution and Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, se...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay quashes FIR in Immoral Traffic Prevention Act case due to illegal search by unauthorised police officer; upholds similar FIR where search conducted by Special Police Officer. Search without warrant under Section 15 of the Immoral Traffic Prevention Act, 1956 must be by Special Police Officer or Trafficking Police Officer; Assistant Police Inspector not authorised.

15 Oct 2016

Two writ petitions were filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing...

High Court

Bombay High Court Disposes Writ Petitions by Police Officers Challenging Investigation Order Under Section 156(3) CrPC. Court Considers Whether Judicial Magistrate First Class Could Direct Investigation Without Application of Mind.

16 Oct 2015

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard two writ petitions filed by police officers challenging an order of the Judicial Magistrate First Class, ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)