Search Results for "Public Analyst report"

137 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 137 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Conviction Under Prevention of Food Adulteration Act for Selling Adulterated Groundnut Oil. Conviction and Sentence of 3 Months RI and Fine of Rs.1000 Upheld as Concurrent Findings of Fact Cannot Be Disturbed in Revision.

The applicant, Santoshkumar Ramchandra Rathi, was convicted by the Chief Judicial Magistrate First Class, Wardha, on 17.9.1999 in Regular Criminal Cas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Managing Director in Seeds Act Case — Lack of Vicarious Liability. Complaint under Section 6(a) read with Section 19(a) of Seeds Act, 1966 fails to disclose role of petitioner as Managing Director.

The petitioner, Rafel Del Riyo, Managing Director of Syngenta India Limited, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 197...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Prosecution in Food Adulteration Case Due to Denial of Right to Second Report from Central Food Laboratory. Right under Section 13(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 frustrated by Food Inspectors' failure to preserve samples properly.

The judgment pertains to two criminal miscellaneous applications filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, by the applicants (R...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Blacklisting of Drug Manufacturer for Supplying Sub-Standard Cream Due to Reliance on Erroneous Test Report. Appellate Lab Report Under Section 25(4) of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 Held Conclusive, Ignoring It Renders Decision Perverse.

The appellant, Medipol Pharmaceutical India Pvt. Ltd., supplied Clotrimazole Cream 1% 15 gm tubes to the respondent, Post Graduate Institute of Medica...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Food Adulteration Case Despite Procedural Lapses. Substantial Compliance of Section 13(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 Sufficient When No Prejudice Caused.

The appellant Vijendra was convicted under Section 7(1)/16(1)(a)(i) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 for selling adulterated buffalo m...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case — Mineral Oil as Foreign Matter Must Exceed 3% Limit Under Rule 44AAA. Clause A.05.17 of Appendix B to Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 permits extraneous matter up to 3% by weight, and mineral oil falls within that category.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of the respondent-accused, Mangala Badkhal, proprietor of M/s. Sweta Spices Industries, for of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Denial of Right to Re-Analysis. Accused Acquitted as Sample Became Unfit for Analysis Under Section 13(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954.

The State of Maharashtra filed three appeals against the acquittal of the accused Harishchandra Sadhuram Agarwal, a vendor and proprietor of a kirana ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Seller and Manufacturer in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 13(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954. Failure to Send Sample to Director of Central Food Laboratory Renders Public Analyst Report Inadmissible.

The case pertains to an appeal filed by the Maharashtra Government through the Food Inspector against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 14.3.2...