Search Results for "Protected workman"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "Protected workman"

132 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 132 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Regional Labour Commissioner's Order Declaring Office Bearers of Unrecognized Union as Protected Workmen Under Section 33(4) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Only Office Bearers of Recognized Union (Federation) Are Entitled to Protected Workmen Status; Deemed Recognition on Expiry of 15 Days Not Contemplated Under Rule 61(4) of Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957.

12 Nov 2024

The Petitioner, Tata Communications Limited, challenged an order dated 14 August 2024 passed by the Regional Labour Commissioner (Central), Pune, decl...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Labour Commissioner's Order Recognizing Protected Workmen in Industrial Dispute — Petitioner's Right to Object to Union's Nominees Upheld Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Conciliation Officer Must Consider Employer's Objections and Pass Reasoned Order Under Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

17 Mar 2023

The petitioner, Tata Marcopolo Motors Limited, is a registered company with a factory in Belur Industrial Area, Dharwad. Some of its employees are mem...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Examines Whether Industrial Tribunal Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Section 33(2)(b) Industrial Disputes Act While Rejecting Approval for Dismissal. Tribunal's Findings on Victimisation and Disproportionate Punishment Without Pleadings and Beyond Limited Prima Facie Review Challenged.

10 Mar 2023

The writ petition arose from an industrial dispute where the management of Bata India Limited challenged the order of the Industrial Tribunal, Bangalo...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Hears Employer's Writ Petition Against Labour Court Order Allowing Workman's Claim for Full Wages under Section 33(C)(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Maintainability of an Individual Workman's Application after Settlement by Other Workmen Examined.

20 Feb 2023

The petitioner, Mulberry Silks Ltd, a company engaged in silk fabric manufacturing, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constituti...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Reference of Industrial Dispute as Stale After 14-Year Delay. Reference Under Section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Vitiated Due to Inordinate Delay Without Justification.

22 Feb 2021

The petitioner, M/s Bata India Limited, challenged an order of reference dated 31.03.2015 made by the State Government under Section 10 of the Industr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case Due to Lack of Pleadings and Evidence of Accidental Injury. Death of cable man from heart attack not compensable under Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 as no causal connection with employment established.

6 Mar 2020

The case involves an appeal by the employer, Western Coal Fields Limited, against an order of the Commissioner under the Employee's Compensation Act, ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Assistant Labour Commissioner's Order Declaring Five Workmen as Protected Workmen — Trade Union Must Be Registered Under Trade Unions Act, 1926 to Claim Protection Under Section 33 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The court held that an unregistered trade union cannot seek declaration of its office bearers as protected workmen under Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

5 Nov 2018

The petitioner, M/s. Wonderla Holidays Limited, a public limited company running amusement parks, challenged an order dated 16.09.2017 passed by the A...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Considers Whether Remedy Under Industrial Disputes Act Is Available to Non-Teaching Staff of Private School in View of Exclusive Remedy Under MEPS Act. Labour Court Had Dismissed References as Not Maintainable Citing Adarsh Shikshan Sanstha and St. Ulai High School Decisions.

9 Dec 2016

Two writ petitions were filed by non-teaching staff of a private school challenging Labour Court awards that dismissed their references under the Indu...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Management's Appeal in Labour Dispute Over Recognition of Protected Workmen. Single Judge's Order Set Aside as Management Has Discretion Under Section 33 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

9 Jan 2013

The case involves a writ appeal filed by the Management, M/s. Fouress Engineering (India) Ltd., challenging an order of a Single Judge of the High Cou...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court's Reinstatement Order in Dispute Over Termination of a Medical Practitioner — Finds Hospital's Termination Illegal for Non-Compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The Court Modified Back Wages to 50% for the Period from Termination to Labour Court Award and Full Back Wages Thereafter.

5 Apr 2011

The case involves a dispute between N.M. Wadia Charitable Trust Hospital, Solapur (appellant) and Dr. Ashok Vyankatesh Apte (respondent), a full-time ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)