Search Results for "Protected Monument"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "Protected Monument"

18 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 18 result(s)

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Second Appeal in Religious Property Dispute — Notice Under Section 202 of Bombay Land Revenue Code Set Aside. Court holds that the Collector lacked jurisdiction to issue notice under Section 202 of the Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879 for removal of encroachment from land claimed as a religious site, as the land was not 'unoccupied' and the plaintiff had established possession and ownership rights.

11 Feb 2026

The case involves a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, filed by the heirs of the original plaintiff, Pirzada Saiyed...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Against Interlocutory Order in Shree Jagannath Temple Construction Case. Construction within prohibited area of centrally protected monument requires compliance with AMASR Act, but public works for devotees may be permitted subject to statutory permissions.

13 May 2022

The Supreme Court dismissed two appeals challenging an interlocutory order of the Orissa High Court in a Public Interest Litigation concerning alleged...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Modifies National Green Tribunal Order on Protected Monument Use to Allow Functions with Restrictions. The Court held that a blanket ban on social functions at a heritage site near a forest area is excessive, and instead imposed specific conditions on noise, fireworks, and laser lights to balance environmental protection and tourism under the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 and Rajasthan Monuments, Archaeological Sites and Antiquities Act, 1961.

11 May 2020

The appeal arose from a judgment of the National Green Tribunal, Central Zonal Bench, Bhopal, which imposed a blanket ban on holding social functions ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Contempt Petition for Non-Compliance of Stay Order in Construction Dispute — No Willful Disobedience Found as Corporation Acted on Different Property. The Court held that the Corporation's action on a different property (House No.6-26-1/2) did not violate the stay order pertaining to House No.6/26, and dismissed the petition under Sections 10 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

27 Feb 2020

The complainant, Dr. Shakeel Ahmed Khan, filed a contempt petition under Sections 10 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, alleging willful diso...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Against Demolition of Commercial Structures in Protected Area of Virupapura Gaddi, Hampi. Constructions in Protected Area Declared Under Mysore Ancient and Historical Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1961 Are Illegal and Subject to Demolition by Hampi World Heritage Area Management Authority.

11 Feb 2020

The Supreme Court dismissed a batch of appeals filed by owners of restaurants, guest houses, and other commercial establishments in Virupapura Gaddi, ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Contempt Petition Against ASI Officials for Alleged Violation of Judgment on Jantar Mantar Protection. No Willful Disobedience Found as Construction Predated Notification and ASI Took Remedial Steps.

9 Jul 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed a contempt petition filed by Shiv Darshan Singh against Rakesh Tiwari, Director General of the Archaeological Survey of In...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Challenging Conversion of Agricultural Land to Non-Agricultural Use Under Section 95 of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 — Petitioners Failed to Establish Any Legal Right or Violation of Procedure. The court held that no notice is required to be given to adjoining landowners under Section 95 and that the petitioners had no locus standi to challenge the conversion.

5 Apr 2019

The petitioners, who were owners of properties adjoining a piece of agricultural land in Chamarajanagar, filed writ petitions challenging the order of...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Customs Prosecution for Export of Antiquities — Prosecution Under Customs Act Not Barred by Antiquities and Art Treasures Act, 1972. Held that the Customs Act, 1962 applies alongside the Antiquities Act, and prosecution under Sections 132 and 135 is maintainable.

27 Feb 2019

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Delhi High Court upholding the discharge of the respondent, Sharad Gandhi, from offences under Sections 132 an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows PIL Seeking Removal of Petrol Pumps Near Bibi Ka Maqbara Heritage Site. Court directs relocation of petrol pumps within 500 meters of the protected monument under the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958 and Heritage Regulations.

24 Oct 2018

The petitioner, Mr. Shahid Aslam, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) seeking the removal of petrol pum...

High Court

Bombay High Court Restrains Construction of Grade Separator Near Protected Monument Under Ancient Monuments Act. Work within 100-meter prohibited area of Pataleshwar Caves requires prior permission from National Monuments Authority under Section 20-A of the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958.

3 Sep 2013

The petitioner, Parisar Sanrakshan Sanwardhan Sanstha, filed a public interest litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the constr...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)